Dynamics of participation in utilization of local value chain services: assessing barriers and enablers in Uganda

Integrating smallholders into agri-food value chains has become a widely endorsed strategy for transforming food systems and reducing poverty in agrarian communities. However, value chain development initiatives are increasingly criticized for their lack of inclusiveness—benefits tend to accrue to resource-rich households, while marginalized communities are often left behind, exacerbating social inequality. There is no clear consensus on the factors driving disparities in participation and utilization of value chain services. Using panel data from soybean smallholders in Uganda, we trace the evolution of participation in value chain service use. We employ a multinomial logit model to (a) identify the drivers and barriers to participation in value chain (VC) service utilization and (b) examine the determinants of variation in service uptake—specifically, the types and number of services used. While the Multinomial Logit Model is also used to analyse variation in service types, a Two-Part Model is applied to assess participation intensity. Our findings show that barriers such as insecure land tenure, limited education, poor access to credit, and distance from service points hinder inclusive participation. Value chain service delivery appears to operate as a mechanism for selecting more viable participants, suggesting that value chain service providers might be adopting risk-averse strategies that (whether intentionally or unintentionally) can exclude resource-poor households from accessing services. Moreover, exclusion tends to persist even after initial participation in farm-level training, limiting subsequent engagement with input and output market services. We discuss the implications of these findings for fostering more inclusive and resilient food systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2025.2607158
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamics of participation in utilization of local value chain services: assessing barriers and enablers in Uganda

John Walker Recha, R. Ruben, Emmanuel Bizimungu, Robert Sparrow
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Dynamics of participation in utilization of local value chain services: assessing barriers and enablers in Uganda

John Walker Recha, R. Ruben, Emmanuel Bizimungu, Robert Sparrow
article en

Abstract

Integrating smallholders into agri-food value chains has become a widely endorsed strategy for transforming food systems and reducing poverty in agrarian communities. However, value chain development initiatives are increasingly criticized for their lack of inclusiveness—benefits tend to accrue to resource-rich households, while marginalized communities are often left behind, exacerbating social inequality. There is no clear consensus on the factors driving disparities in participation and utilization of value chain services. Using panel data from soybean smallholders in Uganda, we trace the evolution of participation in value chain service use. We employ a multinomial logit model to (a) identify the drivers and barriers to participation in value chain (VC) service utilization and (b) examine the determinants of variation in service uptake—specifically, the types and number of services used. While the Multinomial Logit Model is also used to analyse variation in service types, a Two-Part Model is applied to assess participation intensity. Our findings show that barriers such as insecure land tenure, limited education, poor access to credit, and distance from service points hinder inclusive participation. Value chain service delivery appears to operate as a mechanism for selecting more viable participants, suggesting that value chain service providers might be adopting risk-averse strategies that (whether intentionally or unintentionally) can exclude resource-poor households from accessing services. Moreover, exclusion tends to persist even after initial participation in farm-level training, limiting subsequent engagement with input and output market services. We discuss the implications of these findings for fostering more inclusive and resilient food systems.

Cogent Food & AgricultureVol. 12(1)
International Livestock Research Institute (KE), Wageningen University & Research (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.