Valuing public preferences by eliciting ecosystem services trade-offs for the extension and management of marine protected areas in Italy

Marine Protected Areas are central to Marine Spatial Planning strategies aimed at protecting biodiversity and sustaining ecosystem services, but their effectiveness ultimately depends on public support. This study investigates Italian citizens’ preferences for Marine Protected Areas expansion through a Discrete Choice Experiment conducted across three coastal zones, the Northern Adriatic Sea, the Northern Tyrrhenian Sea, and the Strait of Sicily, selected for their distinct ecological and socio-economic profiles. Data were collected from 1961 valid respondents via an online survey stratified by age, gender, and income. The choice tasks presented respondents with policy alternatives defined by three attributes, Marine Protected Areas coverage, restriction levels, and an annual eco-tax. Responses were analysed using a mixed logit model to capture random preference heterogeneity and derive willingness to pay estimates. Findings provide novel quantitative evidence by linking household preferences to ecosystem service attributes and by examining regional differences. Results show that citizens strongly favour moderate restrictions over minimal or complete bans, with willingness to pay values up to €10.07 per household annually, and express positive but more modest support for expanding protected areas to 5–10 % coverage (willingness to pay up to €7.08). Regional heterogeneity emerged, with stronger support in northern zones compared to the more fisheries-dependent south, and pro-environmental attitudes were positively associated with preferences for stricter and larger Marine Protected Areas. Overall, the results offer quantitative economic evidence to support the design of socially acceptable conservation policies that align biodiversity targets with public priorities within the framework of sustainable Marine Spatial Planning. • Investigates public preferences for Marine Protected Areas across three Italian coastal zones. • Public broadly supports policies that balance marine conservation with sustainable use. • Moderate restrictions are most acceptable, while complete bans face more cautious support. • Expansion of protected areas is welcomed, but sensitivity to costs remains significant. • Regional differences reflect contrasting socio-economic and ecological contexts in Italy. • Environmental attitudes strongly influence willingness to support conservation measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ocean & Coastal Management
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2026.108092
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Valuing public preferences by eliciting ecosystem services trade-offs for the extension and management of marine protected areas in Italy

Sina Ahmadi Kaliji, Giulio Malorgio, Andrea Mattia Pacifico, Luca Mulazzani
Ocean & Coastal Management
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
article

Valuing public preferences by eliciting ecosystem services trade-offs for the extension and management of marine protected areas in Italy

Sina Ahmadi Kaliji, Giulio Malorgio, Andrea Mattia Pacifico, Luca Mulazzani
article en

Abstract

Marine Protected Areas are central to Marine Spatial Planning strategies aimed at protecting biodiversity and sustaining ecosystem services, but their effectiveness ultimately depends on public support. This study investigates Italian citizens’ preferences for Marine Protected Areas expansion through a Discrete Choice Experiment conducted across three coastal zones, the Northern Adriatic Sea, the Northern Tyrrhenian Sea, and the Strait of Sicily, selected for their distinct ecological and socio-economic profiles. Data were collected from 1961 valid respondents via an online survey stratified by age, gender, and income. The choice tasks presented respondents with policy alternatives defined by three attributes, Marine Protected Areas coverage, restriction levels, and an annual eco-tax. Responses were analysed using a mixed logit model to capture random preference heterogeneity and derive willingness to pay estimates. Findings provide novel quantitative evidence by linking household preferences to ecosystem service attributes and by examining regional differences. Results show that citizens strongly favour moderate restrictions over minimal or complete bans, with willingness to pay values up to €10.07 per household annually, and express positive but more modest support for expanding protected areas to 5–10 % coverage (willingness to pay up to €7.08). Regional heterogeneity emerged, with stronger support in northern zones compared to the more fisheries-dependent south, and pro-environmental attitudes were positively associated with preferences for stricter and larger Marine Protected Areas. Overall, the results offer quantitative economic evidence to support the design of socially acceptable conservation policies that align biodiversity targets with public priorities within the framework of sustainable Marine Spatial Planning. • Investigates public preferences for Marine Protected Areas across three Italian coastal zones. • Public broadly supports policies that balance marine conservation with sustainable use. • Moderate restrictions are most acceptable, while complete bans face more cautious support. • Expansion of protected areas is welcomed, but sensitivity to costs remains significant. • Regional differences reflect contrasting socio-economic and ecological contexts in Italy. • Environmental attitudes strongly influence willingness to support conservation measures.

Ocean & Coastal ManagementVol. 274
University of Bologna (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.