Elevation Accuracy Assessment of Aerial LiDAR against Total Station for Topographic Mapping under Diverse Terrain Conditions

Topographic mapping requires precise three-dimensional (3D) coordinates for geospatial applications. Conventional terrestrial surveys using Total Station (TS) and GNSS-RTK provide reliable accuracy but are time-consuming. Aerial LiDAR offers a faster alternative by generating high-density point clouds with wide coverage, although its accuracy must be evaluated. This study assesses the elevation accuracy of LiDAR compared to TS across six terrain categories: open ground surface, vegetation-covered surface, road section, sparsely populated settlement, densely populated settlement, and river. Data acquisition employed a 1 m grid to align horizontal coordinates and focused on elevation values. The evaluation included descriptive statistics, elevation difference histograms, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and linear correlation analysis. Results indicate that LiDAR achieved high accuracy in open ground and road sections, with low RMSE and correlation values equal to one. Accuracy decreased in settlements due to roof and wall reflections, and in dense vegetation where laser pulses were blocked by canopy. Despite these limitations, LiDAR effectively represented contour patterns after filtering, classification, and breakline addition. In rivers, LiDAR produced the largest deviations caused by water reflectivity, while TS remained precise for riverbed elevations. This study demonstrates that LiDAR is highly effective for mapping open areas and roads, applicable in settlements with further processing, and still useful in vegetated terrain through its multiple-return capability. However, water bodies require TS validation as a precision reference. Overall, LiDAR provides efficient wide-area data acquisition, while TS continues to serve as the precision standard in complex conditions under ISO/IEC 17025. The application of ISO/IEC 17025 is essential to ensure that measurement, calibration, and data validation comply with principles of accuracy, traceability, and uncertainty control, thereby making topographic mapping results accountable.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JGISE Journal of Geospatial Information Science and Engineering
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22146/jgise.111637
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elevation Accuracy Assessment of Aerial LiDAR against Total Station for Topographic Mapping under Diverse Terrain Conditions

Iqbal Hanun Azizi, Purnama Budi Santosa, Nurrohmat Widjajanti, Fadila Sobasita
JGISE Journal of Geospatial Information Science and Engineering
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Elevation Accuracy Assessment of Aerial LiDAR against Total Station for Topographic Mapping under Diverse Terrain Conditions

Iqbal Hanun Azizi, Purnama Budi Santosa, Nurrohmat Widjajanti, Fadila Sobasita
article en

Abstract

Topographic mapping requires precise three-dimensional (3D) coordinates for geospatial applications. Conventional terrestrial surveys using Total Station (TS) and GNSS-RTK provide reliable accuracy but are time-consuming. Aerial LiDAR offers a faster alternative by generating high-density point clouds with wide coverage, although its accuracy must be evaluated. This study assesses the elevation accuracy of LiDAR compared to TS across six terrain categories: open ground surface, vegetation-covered surface, road section, sparsely populated settlement, densely populated settlement, and river. Data acquisition employed a 1 m grid to align horizontal coordinates and focused on elevation values. The evaluation included descriptive statistics, elevation difference histograms, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and linear correlation analysis. Results indicate that LiDAR achieved high accuracy in open ground and road sections, with low RMSE and correlation values equal to one. Accuracy decreased in settlements due to roof and wall reflections, and in dense vegetation where laser pulses were blocked by canopy. Despite these limitations, LiDAR effectively represented contour patterns after filtering, classification, and breakline addition. In rivers, LiDAR produced the largest deviations caused by water reflectivity, while TS remained precise for riverbed elevations. This study demonstrates that LiDAR is highly effective for mapping open areas and roads, applicable in settlements with further processing, and still useful in vegetated terrain through its multiple-return capability. However, water bodies require TS validation as a precision reference. Overall, LiDAR provides efficient wide-area data acquisition, while TS continues to serve as the precision standard in complex conditions under ISO/IEC 17025. The application of ISO/IEC 17025 is essential to ensure that measurement, calibration, and data validation comply with principles of accuracy, traceability, and uncertainty control, thereby making topographic mapping results accountable.

JGISE Journal of Geospatial Information Science and EngineeringVol. 8(2)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.