Analysis and Determination of Technological Trends of the Development of an Afterburning Chamber of Turbofan Engines

Abstract This study identifies global technological and parametric trends in afterburner design for turbofan engines used in combat aircraft. A sample of 22 third-, fourth-, and fifth-generation aircraft was assembled, and propulsion systems were grouped by Maximum Afterburning (Max AB) thrust: <50 kN, 50–100 kN, and >100 kN. Three efficiency criteria were developed: (i) K 1 , relating thrust-to-weight to total air mass flow; (ii) K 2 , integrating thrust-to-weight with specific fuel consumption at Max AB; and (iii) K 3 , an integral system indicator combining engine thrust, fuel efficiency, number of engines, aircraft maximum speed, combat load, and takeoff weight. Normalized values (0–1) and trends versus development year were analyzed. Results show clear, but non-linear, improvements across generations. Low- and medium-thrust classes exhibit the steepest gains, while the high-thrust class improves more moderately due to platform-level constraints (e.g., weight growth) and stealth-driven afterburner/nozzle compromises that can reduce pressure recovery and K 1 . Despite these trade-offs, modern designs achieve higher integrated efficiency ( K 3 ) via better balances of thrust, fuel economy, and payload/speed. Convergence of normalized indicators suggests proximity to practical technological limits for afterburning sections under current constraints. The methodology provides a quantitative basis for comparing AES concepts and supports future work on variable-cycle/adaptive systems and low-observability-compatible combustor/nozzle solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the Institute of Aviation
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/tar-2025-0016
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis and Determination of Technological Trends of the Development of an Afterburning Chamber of Turbofan Engines

Dmytro Kozel, Vasyl Loginov, Volodymyr Rublev
Transactions of the Institute of Aviation
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
article

Analysis and Determination of Technological Trends of the Development of an Afterburning Chamber of Turbofan Engines

Dmytro Kozel, Vasyl Loginov, Volodymyr Rublev
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study identifies global technological and parametric trends in afterburner design for turbofan engines used in combat aircraft. A sample of 22 third-, fourth-, and fifth-generation aircraft was assembled, and propulsion systems were grouped by Maximum Afterburning (Max AB) thrust: <50 kN, 50–100 kN, and >100 kN. Three efficiency criteria were developed: (i) K 1 , relating thrust-to-weight to total air mass flow; (ii) K 2 , integrating thrust-to-weight with specific fuel consumption at Max AB; and (iii) K 3 , an integral system indicator combining engine thrust, fuel efficiency, number of engines, aircraft maximum speed, combat load, and takeoff weight. Normalized values (0–1) and trends versus development year were analyzed. Results show clear, but non-linear, improvements across generations. Low- and medium-thrust classes exhibit the steepest gains, while the high-thrust class improves more moderately due to platform-level constraints (e.g., weight growth) and stealth-driven afterburner/nozzle compromises that can reduce pressure recovery and K 1 . Despite these trade-offs, modern designs achieve higher integrated efficiency ( K 3 ) via better balances of thrust, fuel economy, and payload/speed. Convergence of normalized indicators suggests proximity to practical technological limits for afterburning sections under current constraints. The methodology provides a quantitative basis for comparing AES concepts and supports future work on variable-cycle/adaptive systems and low-observability-compatible combustor/nozzle solutions.

Transactions of the Institute of AviationVol. 2025(4)
Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University (UA), Kharkiv University of Air Force (UA), Ivchenko Progress (Ukraine) (UA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.