The Joint Research Centre of the EU Commission: An Ideological Dispositif for Whom? A Critical and Positive Discourse Analysis

This paper comprehensively examines the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) public communication and its practices when interacting with recruited external contributors, shedding light on its role as a Foucauldian dispositif in shaping political narratives and policy decisions. Drawing inspiration from the works of Gilbert and Wodak (2000), Rossetti di Valdalbero (2021), and building upon the insights of Hughes (2018), this study employs a blend of Critical and Positive Discourse Analysis, quantitative and qualitative multimodal corpus linguistics, and autoethnography (Chang 2008; Adams et al. 2015) to dissect the JRC's activities and their implications for decision-making processes within the EU. The paper particularly focuses on the political struggles among actors involved in decision-making processes and the impact on report authors. Keywords: Joint Research Centre; dispositif; European Union; discourse analysis; multimodality; autoethnography; political communication

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13135/2611-853x/13015
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Joint Research Centre of the EU Commission: An Ideological Dispositif for Whom? A Critical and Positive Discourse Analysis

Michelangelo Conoscenti
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

The Joint Research Centre of the EU Commission: An Ideological Dispositif for Whom? A Critical and Positive Discourse Analysis

Michelangelo Conoscenti
article en

Abstract

This paper comprehensively examines the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) public communication and its practices when interacting with recruited external contributors, shedding light on its role as a Foucauldian dispositif in shaping political narratives and policy decisions. Drawing inspiration from the works of Gilbert and Wodak (2000), Rossetti di Valdalbero (2021), and building upon the insights of Hughes (2018), this study employs a blend of Critical and Positive Discourse Analysis, quantitative and qualitative multimodal corpus linguistics, and autoethnography (Chang 2008; Adams et al. 2015) to dissect the JRC's activities and their implications for decision-making processes within the EU. The paper particularly focuses on the political struggles among actors involved in decision-making processes and the impact on report authors. Keywords: Joint Research Centre; dispositif; European Union; discourse analysis; multimodality; autoethnography; political communication

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Turin (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.