Understanding Sustainability Competences Through a Paradox Lens: Evidence From Project Management Practice

ABSTRACT Contemporary project environments are increasingly shaped by paradoxical tensions—between control and flexibility, short‐term delivery and long‐term value, or efficiency and innovation—that require project professionals to cultivate a more complex set of competences. This exploratory study reconceptualises soft competences not as peripheral interpersonal assets but as paradox‐handling mechanisms central to navigating the contradictions embedded in managing projects. Drawing on paradox theory, we explore how soft competences enable individuals to reconcile competing logics without succumbing to managerial paralysis. Employing a mixed‐methods design, we integrate survey data from 149 project professionals across five European countries with qualitative insights from executive focus groups. Exploratory factor analysis reveals seven coherent competence factors and a persistent undervaluation of sustainability‐related and ethically grounded soft competences. The study contributes theoretically to paradox‐informed project management and practically to competency development aligned with grand challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70385
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Sustainability Competences Through a Paradox Lens: Evidence From Project Management Practice

Primiano Di Nauta, Franca Cantoni, Antonio Mastrogiorgio, Marco Arcuri
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Understanding Sustainability Competences Through a Paradox Lens: Evidence From Project Management Practice

Primiano Di Nauta, Franca Cantoni, Antonio Mastrogiorgio, Marco Arcuri
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Contemporary project environments are increasingly shaped by paradoxical tensions—between control and flexibility, short‐term delivery and long‐term value, or efficiency and innovation—that require project professionals to cultivate a more complex set of competences. This exploratory study reconceptualises soft competences not as peripheral interpersonal assets but as paradox‐handling mechanisms central to navigating the contradictions embedded in managing projects. Drawing on paradox theory, we explore how soft competences enable individuals to reconcile competing logics without succumbing to managerial paralysis. Employing a mixed‐methods design, we integrate survey data from 149 project professionals across five European countries with qualitative insights from executive focus groups. Exploratory factor analysis reveals seven coherent competence factors and a persistent undervaluation of sustainability‐related and ethically grounded soft competences. The study contributes theoretically to paradox‐informed project management and practically to competency development aligned with grand challenges.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Foggia (IT), Unitelma Sapienza University (IT)
European Commission, European Education and Culture Executive Agency, Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.