Governance Below the Legal Threshold: De-Facto Binding Power and the Erosion of Accountability in International Law

This paper examines the growing phenomenon of governance practices that operate below formal legal thresholds yet produce de-facto binding effects in international law. It analyzes how informal instruments, soft law mechanisms, and hybrid regulatory arrangements increasingly shape state behavior while evading traditional accountability frameworks. Focusing on areas such as global health governance, EU conditionality, and hybrid diplomacy, the paper argues that the proliferation of such mechanisms contributes to an erosion of legal responsibility and democratic oversight. The analysis highlights structural accountability gaps and calls for a more precise legal and normative assessment of de-facto binding governance practices. This paper is also available on SSRN. The Zenodo version serves as an open-access archival reference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18114673
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance Below the Legal Threshold: De-Facto Binding Power and the Erosion of Accountability in International Law

Björn Paulini
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

Governance Below the Legal Threshold: De-Facto Binding Power and the Erosion of Accountability in International Law

Björn Paulini
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the growing phenomenon of governance practices that operate below formal legal thresholds yet produce de-facto binding effects in international law. It analyzes how informal instruments, soft law mechanisms, and hybrid regulatory arrangements increasingly shape state behavior while evading traditional accountability frameworks. Focusing on areas such as global health governance, EU conditionality, and hybrid diplomacy, the paper argues that the proliferation of such mechanisms contributes to an erosion of legal responsibility and democratic oversight. The analysis highlights structural accountability gaps and calls for a more precise legal and normative assessment of de-facto binding governance practices. This paper is also available on SSRN. The Zenodo version serves as an open-access archival reference.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), London Metropolitan University (GB), University of Cumbria (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Governance Below the Legal Threshold: De-Facto Binding Power and the Erosion of Accountability in International Law — Björn Paulini · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS