Spaces for Reversed Participation in Urban Transitions: Exploratory Dialogical Workshops with Civil and Formal Activist Planners in Oslo

The role of civil society in sustainable and just transitions has gained increased attention in research and in urban policies and planning. Planning theory and practice are searching for new ways to reorient and readdress sustainable transitions, allowing for less complete and more experimental approaches to contextual social-ecological connections. Sager (2016, 2018) frames the concept of “activist planning” to describe how intentional communities, as well as formal government actors, work strategically with alternative and radical development approaches to urban transitions. However, less attention has been given to how spaces of interaction between government and civil society actors are generated and reciprocated. Such participatory spaces do not emerge on their own. Rather, participation is often confined to either invited spaces “inside the planning system”– where the municipality invites citizens to respond to defined planning purposes, or in “claimed spaces” – where civil society interacts “outside the planning system” (Cornwall, 2008). In this paper we explore how “intermediary spaces” for participation between government and civil society actors can be generated to facilitate better collaboration, without the citizens’ initiatives being stripped of their self-governance and motivation. Our research shows that creating “intermediary spaces” through exploratory dialogical workshops can facilitate a form of “reversed participation.” As opposed to invited spaces where municipal policies and plans form the outset for participation, these workshops were shaped based on the citizens’ initiatives and projects. The workshops generated improved understanding of and learning about challenges and opportunities for long-term development of citizens’ community initiatives, collaborations with the municipality, and new models for supportive and collaborative actions between citizens’ initiatives and formal government actors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Journal of Urban Studies
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18261/njus.6.1.2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spaces for Reversed Participation in Urban Transitions: Exploratory Dialogical Workshops with Civil and Formal Activist Planners in Oslo

Kirsten Paaby, Mikaela Vasstrøm
2 citations
Nordic Journal of Urban Studies
Urban Planning and Governance
12.35
article

Spaces for Reversed Participation in Urban Transitions: Exploratory Dialogical Workshops with Civil and Formal Activist Planners in Oslo

Kirsten Paaby, Mikaela Vasstrøm
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The role of civil society in sustainable and just transitions has gained increased attention in research and in urban policies and planning. Planning theory and practice are searching for new ways to reorient and readdress sustainable transitions, allowing for less complete and more experimental approaches to contextual social-ecological connections. Sager (2016, 2018) frames the concept of “activist planning” to describe how intentional communities, as well as formal government actors, work strategically with alternative and radical development approaches to urban transitions. However, less attention has been given to how spaces of interaction between government and civil society actors are generated and reciprocated. Such participatory spaces do not emerge on their own. Rather, participation is often confined to either invited spaces “inside the planning system”– where the municipality invites citizens to respond to defined planning purposes, or in “claimed spaces” – where civil society interacts “outside the planning system” (Cornwall, 2008). In this paper we explore how “intermediary spaces” for participation between government and civil society actors can be generated to facilitate better collaboration, without the citizens’ initiatives being stripped of their self-governance and motivation. Our research shows that creating “intermediary spaces” through exploratory dialogical workshops can facilitate a form of “reversed participation.” As opposed to invited spaces where municipal policies and plans form the outset for participation, these workshops were shaped based on the citizens’ initiatives and projects. The workshops generated improved understanding of and learning about challenges and opportunities for long-term development of citizens’ community initiatives, collaborations with the municipality, and new models for supportive and collaborative actions between citizens’ initiatives and formal government actors.

Nordic Journal of Urban StudiesVol. 6(1-2026)
Center for Global Development (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Urban Planning and Governance
12.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Spaces for Reversed Participation in Urban Transitions: Exploratory Dialogical Workshops with Civil and Formal Activist Planners in Oslo — Kirsten Paaby, Mikaela Vasstrøm · Nordic Journal of Urban Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS