The ecosystemic governance for impact (EGI) framework: coordinating innovation across actors, tools and value trajectories

Purpose This paper aims to propose the ecosystemic governance for impact (EGI) framework to help innovation ecosystems generate lasting, stakeholder-aligned impact. By combining service-dominant logic (S-D logic), digitalization and Industry 4.0 (D&I4), project management (PM) and benefit realization management (BRM), the framework balances rigor with flexibility to coordinate actors, tools and value co-creation processes. Design/methodology/approach The study employs an abductive, qualitative case study design drawing on a national R&D project (Ditron-C). The analysis integrates data from interviews, project documents, field observations and co-design artifacts, interpreted through four innovation management approaches. Findings The EGI framework structures innovation governance around four phases: co-visioning, co-design, co-realization and co-evolution. Each phase supports structured planning and adaptive coordination among actors, helping translate project outputs into sustained impact. Research limitations/implications Findings are based on a retail innovation project and validated through a cross-sector application. While these cases support the transferability of the framework, further research could examine the applicability of the framework across different ecosystems and in conditions of extreme power asymmetries. Practical implications In practice, EGI helps managers move beyond checklists and dashboards, providing a scaffold that keeps negotiations open and makes impact visible over time. Social implications The framework promotes inclusive governance and participatory alignment among ecosystem actors, enabling innovation processes to support lasting and mutually negotiated impact. Originality/value This paper proposes a mid-range theoretical framework that reframes innovation governance as a reflexive and ecosystemic process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Innovation Management
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-02-2025-0205
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ecosystemic governance for impact (EGI) framework: coordinating innovation across actors, tools and value trajectories

Carlo Alessandro Sirianni, D Sarno, Francesco Polese
European Journal of Innovation Management
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

The ecosystemic governance for impact (EGI) framework: coordinating innovation across actors, tools and value trajectories

Carlo Alessandro Sirianni, D Sarno, Francesco Polese
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to propose the ecosystemic governance for impact (EGI) framework to help innovation ecosystems generate lasting, stakeholder-aligned impact. By combining service-dominant logic (S-D logic), digitalization and Industry 4.0 (D&I4), project management (PM) and benefit realization management (BRM), the framework balances rigor with flexibility to coordinate actors, tools and value co-creation processes. Design/methodology/approach The study employs an abductive, qualitative case study design drawing on a national R&D project (Ditron-C). The analysis integrates data from interviews, project documents, field observations and co-design artifacts, interpreted through four innovation management approaches. Findings The EGI framework structures innovation governance around four phases: co-visioning, co-design, co-realization and co-evolution. Each phase supports structured planning and adaptive coordination among actors, helping translate project outputs into sustained impact. Research limitations/implications Findings are based on a retail innovation project and validated through a cross-sector application. While these cases support the transferability of the framework, further research could examine the applicability of the framework across different ecosystems and in conditions of extreme power asymmetries. Practical implications In practice, EGI helps managers move beyond checklists and dashboards, providing a scaffold that keeps negotiations open and makes impact visible over time. Social implications The framework promotes inclusive governance and participatory alignment among ecosystem actors, enabling innovation processes to support lasting and mutually negotiated impact. Originality/value This paper proposes a mid-range theoretical framework that reframes innovation governance as a reflexive and ecosystemic process.

European Journal of Innovation ManagementVol. 29(1)
University of Salerno (IT), Parthenope University of Naples (IT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.