Comparative accuracy analysis of denture bases fabricated by DLP and LCD 3D printing technologies

(digital dentistry) ., 3 (3D printing) , , [1-3].3D (additive manufacturing) , computer-aided design (CAD) . , , , [4]. , , (wax-up), (processing), (polishing) , [5]., (shrinkage) (retention), (support), (stability) . Purpose: To evaluate and compare the dimensional accuracy of maxillary denture bases fabricated using digital light processing (DLP) and liquid crystal display (LCD) 3D printing technologies with the same materials and standardized printing parameters.Methods: A standard edentulous maxillary model was used to design a computer-aided de- sign (CAD)-based denture base, which was then printed using DLP (Asiga Pro 4K, 10 specimens) and LCD (UNIZ NBEE, 10 specimens) printers.After post-processing, all specimens were scanned and analyzed using Geomagic Control X. Dimensional accuracy was assessed by calculating the root mean square (RMS) deviation between the printed and reference CAD data.Data were analyzed using Welch's t-test (=0.05).Results: RMS values were significantly lower in the LCD group (98.303.41m) than in the DLP group (166.5924.18m) (p<0.001),indicating superior geometric fidelity.Color difference maps revealed consistent accuracy across the LCD-printed surfaces, whereas DLPprinted samples showed distortion in margin and palatal regions. Conclusion:Under standardized conditions, the LCD printing method demonstrated higher dimensional accuracy and consistency than the DLP method, suggesting its relative clinical suitability for complete denture fabrication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Korean Acedemy of Dental Technology
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2025.47.4.193
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative accuracy analysis of denture bases fabricated by DLP and LCD 3D printing technologies

Hee-Jung Lee, Eun-Jeong Bae, Wan-Sun Lee
Journal of Korean Acedemy of Dental Technology
Dental materials and restorations
article

Comparative accuracy analysis of denture bases fabricated by DLP and LCD 3D printing technologies

Hee-Jung Lee, Eun-Jeong Bae, Wan-Sun Lee
article en

Abstract

(digital dentistry) ., 3 (3D printing) , , [1-3].3D (additive manufacturing) , computer-aided design (CAD) . , , , [4]. , , (wax-up), (processing), (polishing) , [5]., (shrinkage) (retention), (support), (stability) . Purpose: To evaluate and compare the dimensional accuracy of maxillary denture bases fabricated using digital light processing (DLP) and liquid crystal display (LCD) 3D printing technologies with the same materials and standardized printing parameters.Methods: A standard edentulous maxillary model was used to design a computer-aided de- sign (CAD)-based denture base, which was then printed using DLP (Asiga Pro 4K, 10 specimens) and LCD (UNIZ NBEE, 10 specimens) printers.After post-processing, all specimens were scanned and analyzed using Geomagic Control X. Dimensional accuracy was assessed by calculating the root mean square (RMS) deviation between the printed and reference CAD data.Data were analyzed using Welch's t-test (=0.05).Results: RMS values were significantly lower in the LCD group (98.303.41m) than in the DLP group (166.5924.18m) (p<0.001),indicating superior geometric fidelity.Color difference maps revealed consistent accuracy across the LCD-printed surfaces, whereas DLPprinted samples showed distortion in margin and palatal regions. Conclusion:Under standardized conditions, the LCD printing method demonstrated higher dimensional accuracy and consistency than the DLP method, suggesting its relative clinical suitability for complete denture fabrication.

Journal of Korean Acedemy of Dental TechnologyVol. 47(4)
Korean Academy of Science and Technology (KR), Bucheon University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.