Collum Angle Of Maxillary Central Incisors In Class III Malocclusions: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the angle of the maxillary central incisors in Class I and Class III malocclusions, with cephalometric radiography Methods: This study analyzed 120 lateral cephalometric radiographs classified into study and control groups based on Angle’s classification, ANB angles, and Wits appraisal. The study group with skeletal Class III malocclusion, while the control group included individuals with skeletal Class I malocclusion The study group comprised 33 female and 27 male patients with a mean age of 13,59± 3,53, while the control group included 32 female and 28 male patients with a mean age of 14,26±2,60. The collum angle was defined as the angle between the long axes of the root and crown. Various cephalometric parameters were assessed, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: The study group exhibited significantly greater proclination of the maxillary incisors than the control group, as evidenced by higher 1/NA° and 1-NA (mm) values (p < 0.001). The mean collum angle was significantly higher in Class III individuals (4.05° ± 3.98) than in Class I individuals (−0.44° ± 5.24) (p<0.001), indicating a more pronounced labial root positioning. These morphological features are consistent with true skeletal Class III malocclusion. Conclusion: The increased collum angle observed in Class III individuals results in a more labial root position, which may heighten the risk of dehiscence and fenestration during orthodontic treatment. Therefore, clinicians should consider this factor when planning treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Dergisi (NEU Dent J) Necmettin Erbakan
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51122/neudentj.2025.172
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collum Angle Of Maxillary Central Incisors In Class III Malocclusions: A Cross-Sectional Study

Gökhan Serhat Duran, Ebru Yurdakurban, Kübra Gülnur Topsakal, Şule Gökmen et al.
Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Dergisi (NEU Dent J) Necmettin Erbakan
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Collum Angle Of Maxillary Central Incisors In Class III Malocclusions: A Cross-Sectional Study

Gökhan Serhat Duran, Ebru Yurdakurban, Kübra Gülnur Topsakal, Şule Gökmen, Serkan Görgülü
article en

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the angle of the maxillary central incisors in Class I and Class III malocclusions, with cephalometric radiography Methods: This study analyzed 120 lateral cephalometric radiographs classified into study and control groups based on Angle’s classification, ANB angles, and Wits appraisal. The study group with skeletal Class III malocclusion, while the control group included individuals with skeletal Class I malocclusion The study group comprised 33 female and 27 male patients with a mean age of 13,59± 3,53, while the control group included 32 female and 28 male patients with a mean age of 14,26±2,60. The collum angle was defined as the angle between the long axes of the root and crown. Various cephalometric parameters were assessed, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: The study group exhibited significantly greater proclination of the maxillary incisors than the control group, as evidenced by higher 1/NA° and 1-NA (mm) values (p < 0.001). The mean collum angle was significantly higher in Class III individuals (4.05° ± 3.98) than in Class I individuals (−0.44° ± 5.24) (p<0.001), indicating a more pronounced labial root positioning. These morphological features are consistent with true skeletal Class III malocclusion. Conclusion: The increased collum angle observed in Class III individuals results in a more labial root position, which may heighten the risk of dehiscence and fenestration during orthodontic treatment. Therefore, clinicians should consider this factor when planning treatment strategies.

Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Dergisi (NEU Dent J) Necmettin Erbakan
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi (TR), Gülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Muğla University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.