Soil compaction control by monitoring compacted states based on soil stiffness indices

A number of empirical equations, expressing the various types of soil stiffness indices (SSIs) of compacted soil as functions of dry density ρd and degree of saturation Sr, are summarized in this study. They are generalized in the normalized form of SSI= CSSI·FSSI(ΔSr)·GSSI([Dc]1Ec). CSSI is the coefficient, different for different SSI test conditions, FSSI(ΔSr) is a decreasing function of ΔSr= Sr – “the optimum, (Sr)opt” with FSSI(ΔSr = 0) = 1.0, and GSSI([Dc]1Ec) is an increasing function of the degree of compaction by the Standard Proctor test, [Dc]1Ec, with GSSI([Dc]1Ec = 100 %) = 1.0. Under the various conditions of the data, the GSSI functions are rather similar, whereas the FSSI functions are largely different. With drained SSIs evaluated at relatively low strains and relatively low confining pressures, FSSI is considerably large when ΔSr < 0 due to the fairly large effects of Sr on these SSIs. As a result, when Sr is in a certain range just below (Sr)opt, the SSIs become the effective indices of water content w, rather than ρd. The compacted water content can be estimated and controlled to remain within a narrow range centered at the target by keeping the frequently measured field SSIs between the defined upper and lower thresholds. The procedure for determining the target and the upper and lower bounds of the SSIs, based on field calibration compaction test data and relevant normalized empirical SSI equations, is explained. A simplified method is proposed, which suggests that, when field SSIs are kept between 0.5 and 2.0 times the target SSI, compacted w values are expected to be approximately maintained between 0.8 and 1.2 times the target w.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101709
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil compaction control by monitoring compacted states based on soil stiffness indices

Y. Kikuchi, Y. Tomita, F. Tatsuoka, R. Latimer et al.
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
article

Soil compaction control by monitoring compacted states based on soil stiffness indices

Y. Kikuchi, Y. Tomita, F. Tatsuoka, R. Latimer, J. Koseki, T. Yoshida, H. Nagai
article en

Abstract

A number of empirical equations, expressing the various types of soil stiffness indices (SSIs) of compacted soil as functions of dry density ρd and degree of saturation Sr, are summarized in this study. They are generalized in the normalized form of SSI= CSSI·FSSI(ΔSr)·GSSI([Dc]1Ec). CSSI is the coefficient, different for different SSI test conditions, FSSI(ΔSr) is a decreasing function of ΔSr= Sr – “the optimum, (Sr)opt” with FSSI(ΔSr = 0) = 1.0, and GSSI([Dc]1Ec) is an increasing function of the degree of compaction by the Standard Proctor test, [Dc]1Ec, with GSSI([Dc]1Ec = 100 %) = 1.0. Under the various conditions of the data, the GSSI functions are rather similar, whereas the FSSI functions are largely different. With drained SSIs evaluated at relatively low strains and relatively low confining pressures, FSSI is considerably large when ΔSr < 0 due to the fairly large effects of Sr on these SSIs. As a result, when Sr is in a certain range just below (Sr)opt, the SSIs become the effective indices of water content w, rather than ρd. The compacted water content can be estimated and controlled to remain within a narrow range centered at the target by keeping the frequently measured field SSIs between the defined upper and lower thresholds. The procedure for determining the target and the upper and lower bounds of the SSIs, based on field calibration compaction test data and relevant normalized empirical SSI equations, is explained. A simplified method is proposed, which suggests that, when field SSIs are kept between 0.5 and 2.0 times the target SSI, compacted w values are expected to be approximately maintained between 0.8 and 1.2 times the target w.

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONSVol. 66(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.