Working memory exertion after simultaneous interpreting in bilinguals

Simultaneous interpreting (SI), a challenging task enabled by bilingualism, is claimed to distinctly tax working memory (WM). However, causal designs are missing, limiting our understanding of the phenomenon. We recruited 50 Chinese-English bilinguals and assessed their WM performance (alongside inhibitory and fluency outcomes) before and after L1-L2 SI or a control task (text comprehension). WM scores (especially under high-demand, multimodal conditions) increased after text comprehension but not after SI, adjusting for age of L2 appropriation, years of L2 use, L2 proficiency and SI competence. Of note, WM was assessed immediately before and after SI, ruling out other cognitive influences. Conversely, no distinct patterns were observed on inhibitory or fluency tasks. Briefly, this activity seems to hinder practice-related WM gains - a finding that expands contemporary accounts of interpreting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728925100898
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working memory exertion after simultaneous interpreting in bilinguals

Agustina Birba, Isabelle Chou, E. Galvez Munoz, Jiehui Hu et al.
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
article

Working memory exertion after simultaneous interpreting in bilinguals

Agustina Birba, Isabelle Chou, E. Galvez Munoz, Jiehui Hu, Adolfo M. Garcia, Guoqing Kwon
article en

Abstract

Simultaneous interpreting (SI), a challenging task enabled by bilingualism, is claimed to distinctly tax working memory (WM). However, causal designs are missing, limiting our understanding of the phenomenon. We recruited 50 Chinese-English bilinguals and assessed their WM performance (alongside inhibitory and fluency outcomes) before and after L1-L2 SI or a control task (text comprehension). WM scores (especially under high-demand, multimodal conditions) increased after text comprehension but not after SI, adjusting for age of L2 appropriation, years of L2 use, L2 proficiency and SI competence. Of note, WM was assessed immediately before and after SI, ruling out other cognitive influences. Conversely, no distinct patterns were observed on inhibitory or fluency tasks. Briefly, this activity seems to hinder practice-related WM gains - a finding that expands contemporary accounts of interpreting.

Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), University of Languages and International Studies (VN), Universidad de La Laguna (ES), Universidad de Los Andes, Chile (CL), University of California System (US), University of San Andrés (AR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.