Gait Dynamics Classification with Criticality Analysis and Support Vector Machines

Classifying demographic groups of humans from gait patterns is desirable from several long-standing diagnostic and monitoring perspectives. IMU recorded gait patterns are mapped into a nonlinear dynamic representation space using criticality analysis and subsequently classified using standard Support Vector Machines. Inertial-only gait recordings were found to readily classify in the CA representations. Accuracies across age categories for female versus male were 72.77%, 78.95%, and 80.11% for σ=0.1, 1, and 10, respectively; within the female group, accuracies were 73.36%, 76.70%, and 78.90%; and within the male group, 77.65%, 81.48%, and 81.05%. These results show that dynamic biological data are easily classifiable when projected into the nonlinear space, while classifying the data without this is not nearly as effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math14010177
Primary Topic
Gait Recognition and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gait Dynamics Classification with Criticality Analysis and Support Vector Machines

Helen Dawes, T. Scheper, Patrick Esser, Shadi Eltanani et al.
Mathematics
Gait Recognition and Analysis
article

Gait Dynamics Classification with Criticality Analysis and Support Vector Machines

Helen Dawes, T. Scheper, Patrick Esser, Shadi Eltanani, Johnny W. Collett
article en

Abstract

Classifying demographic groups of humans from gait patterns is desirable from several long-standing diagnostic and monitoring perspectives. IMU recorded gait patterns are mapped into a nonlinear dynamic representation space using criticality analysis and subsequently classified using standard Support Vector Machines. Inertial-only gait recordings were found to readily classify in the CA representations. Accuracies across age categories for female versus male were 72.77%, 78.95%, and 80.11% for σ=0.1, 1, and 10, respectively; within the female group, accuracies were 73.36%, 76.70%, and 78.90%; and within the male group, 77.65%, 81.48%, and 81.05%. These results show that dynamic biological data are easily classifiable when projected into the nonlinear space, while classifying the data without this is not nearly as effective.

MathematicsVol. 14(1)
Oxford Brookes University (GB), University of Exeter (GB), NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility (GB)
Oxford Brookes University
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Gait Recognition and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.