Media effects revisited: corporate scandals, partisan narratives, and attitudes toward cryptocurrency regulation

Abstract This article advances the literature on media effects by examining how contrasting partisan narratives influence support for regulation after a real-world corporate scandal. Using both multi-wave observational and randomized experimental data, we show that self-selected media exposure and experimentally assigned information shape public opinion in distinct ways. While scandals are narratives of regulatory failure, partisan media environments differently attribute blame for that failure. In two separate observational waves, only Democrats exposed to news about the FTX bankruptcy increased their support for crypto regulation. In the experiment, only Republicans shifted in favor of regulation. Research on media effects needs to take into account not only media content, but also the partisan information environments that expose citizens to that content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Science Research and Methods
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2025.10079
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Media effects revisited: corporate scandals, partisan narratives, and attitudes toward cryptocurrency regulation

Pepper D. Culpepper, Ryan Shandler, Taeku Lee
Political Science Research and Methods
Media Influence and Politics
article

Media effects revisited: corporate scandals, partisan narratives, and attitudes toward cryptocurrency regulation

Pepper D. Culpepper, Ryan Shandler, Taeku Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article advances the literature on media effects by examining how contrasting partisan narratives influence support for regulation after a real-world corporate scandal. Using both multi-wave observational and randomized experimental data, we show that self-selected media exposure and experimentally assigned information shape public opinion in distinct ways. While scandals are narratives of regulatory failure, partisan media environments differently attribute blame for that failure. In two separate observational waves, only Democrats exposed to news about the FTX bankruptcy increased their support for crypto regulation. In the experiment, only Republicans shifted in favor of regulation. Research on media effects needs to take into account not only media content, but also the partisan information environments that expose citizens to that content.

Political Science Research and Methods
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Harvard University Press (US), University of Oxford (GB)
University of Oxford, European Commission
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Media Influence and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Media effects revisited: corporate scandals, partisan narratives, and attitudes toward cryptocurrency regulation — Pepper D. Culpepper, Ryan Shandler, et al. · Political Science Research and Methods (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS