Clean enough? Acceptance of urine-derived dry fertilizer and water shaped by religious and social norms in a water-scarce Islamic context

Although wastewater irrigation is broadly accepted in many water-scarce regions, proposals to recycle human urine often face greater social resistance. We hypothesized that this resistance stems because "urine" is perceived as a symbolic substance that triggers stronger cultural and psychological responses than "wastewater." We further predicted that framing urine recycling as nutrient recovery versus water recycling would elicit distinct patterns of acceptance. To test this, we conducted a structured survey in Jordan, evaluating support for four urine recycling scenarios: dry fertilizer, and reclaimed water for handwashing, toilet flushing, or irrigation-each presented in both general and proximal contexts. Support was consistently high for dry fertilizer, particularly when applied to non-food crops, while recycled water for intimate uses such as handwashing received the lowest support. Perception of Islamic jurisprudence regarding cleanliness emerged as central to how respondents evaluated urine-derived water: those who classified it as taher (clean but not purifying) or tahoor (ritually clean and purifying) were generally more supportive, while those who viewed it as najis (impure) tended to oppose all forms of recycling. Perceived approval from family and close social circles was a stronger predictor of support than perceived views within the wider religious community, affirming that acceptance is negotiated largely through interpersonal norms in this context. Cluster analysis identified two respondent profiles: a more open group who supported most forms of urine recycling, saw environmental value in the practice, and viewed recycled water as taher; and a more skeptical group who were less supportive, particularly in personal or proximate contexts, often viewed the water as najis, and anticipated strong social disapproval. Our findings suggest that a starting point for broadening public acceptance of urine recycling could involve engaging agrarian communities, where familiarity with existing wastewater irrigation practices may contribute to greater openness toward resource recovery from human urine. Among the scenarios tested, dry fertilizer derived from urine appears especially promising, as it bypasses many of the cultural and symbolic barriers associated with recycling.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Desalination
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2025.119804
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clean enough? Acceptance of urine-derived dry fertilizer and water shaped by religious and social norms in a water-scarce Islamic context

Anastasija Vasiljev, Prithvi Simha, Dheaya Alrousan, Melissa A. Barton et al.
1 citations
Desalination
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
35.31
article

Clean enough? Acceptance of urine-derived dry fertilizer and water shaped by religious and social norms in a water-scarce Islamic context

Anastasija Vasiljev, Prithvi Simha, Dheaya Alrousan, Melissa A. Barton, Luis Fernando Perez-Mercado, Sahar S. Dalahmeh, Jan-Olof Drangert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although wastewater irrigation is broadly accepted in many water-scarce regions, proposals to recycle human urine often face greater social resistance. We hypothesized that this resistance stems because "urine" is perceived as a symbolic substance that triggers stronger cultural and psychological responses than "wastewater." We further predicted that framing urine recycling as nutrient recovery versus water recycling would elicit distinct patterns of acceptance. To test this, we conducted a structured survey in Jordan, evaluating support for four urine recycling scenarios: dry fertilizer, and reclaimed water for handwashing, toilet flushing, or irrigation-each presented in both general and proximal contexts. Support was consistently high for dry fertilizer, particularly when applied to non-food crops, while recycled water for intimate uses such as handwashing received the lowest support. Perception of Islamic jurisprudence regarding cleanliness emerged as central to how respondents evaluated urine-derived water: those who classified it as taher (clean but not purifying) or tahoor (ritually clean and purifying) were generally more supportive, while those who viewed it as najis (impure) tended to oppose all forms of recycling. Perceived approval from family and close social circles was a stronger predictor of support than perceived views within the wider religious community, affirming that acceptance is negotiated largely through interpersonal norms in this context. Cluster analysis identified two respondent profiles: a more open group who supported most forms of urine recycling, saw environmental value in the practice, and viewed recycled water as taher; and a more skeptical group who were less supportive, particularly in personal or proximate contexts, often viewed the water as najis, and anticipated strong social disapproval. Our findings suggest that a starting point for broadening public acceptance of urine recycling could involve engaging agrarian communities, where familiarity with existing wastewater irrigation practices may contribute to greater openness toward resource recovery from human urine. Among the scenarios tested, dry fertilizer derived from urine appears especially promising, as it bypasses many of the cultural and symbolic barriers associated with recycling.

DesalinationVol. 623
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
35.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.