No more secrets? De-monopolizing intelligence

Intelligence scholars have described the contemporary availability ofOpen-Source Intelligence (OSINT) and the entrance of civil society actorsinto the field of intelligence as a “democratization of intelligence”, therebyportraying a fundamentally positive and inclusive enterprise. Assessingthe implications of the recent explosion of OSINT groups and activists fortraditional state intelligence actors, this chapter instead introduces theconcept of de-monopolization. A turn to de-monopolization bringsattention to the competitive aspects arising when civil society actorsenter the field of intelligence. The chapter outlines two different forms ofcompetition currently affecting state intelligence actors: a competition forinsights and a competition for epistemic authority. Describing thesecontemporary tendencies and their impact on state intelligence work, thechapter then discusses how an increase in OSINT by civil society actorsgenerates new tasks for intelligence actors, introduces new ideals, andpushes state intelligence agencies to defend their expertise in public.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Foreign Policy Journal
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2025.2603703
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No more secrets? De-monopolizing intelligence

Hedvig Ördén, Kira Vrist Rønn
1 citations
Canadian Foreign Policy Journal
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
8.52
article

No more secrets? De-monopolizing intelligence

Hedvig Ördén, Kira Vrist Rønn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Intelligence scholars have described the contemporary availability ofOpen-Source Intelligence (OSINT) and the entrance of civil society actorsinto the field of intelligence as a “democratization of intelligence”, therebyportraying a fundamentally positive and inclusive enterprise. Assessingthe implications of the recent explosion of OSINT groups and activists fortraditional state intelligence actors, this chapter instead introduces theconcept of de-monopolization. A turn to de-monopolization bringsattention to the competitive aspects arising when civil society actorsenter the field of intelligence. The chapter outlines two different forms ofcompetition currently affecting state intelligence actors: a competition forinsights and a competition for epistemic authority. Describing thesecontemporary tendencies and their impact on state intelligence work, thechapter then discusses how an increase in OSINT by civil society actorsgenerates new tasks for intelligence actors, introduces new ideals, andpushes state intelligence agencies to defend their expertise in public.

Canadian Foreign Policy JournalVol. 31(2)
Norwegian Police University College (NO), Lund University (SE), Swedish Institute of International Affairs (SE), Defence Institute of Psychological Research (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

No more secrets? De-monopolizing intelligence — Hedvig Ördén, Kira Vrist Rønn · Canadian Foreign Policy Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS