Machine Learning Approach to Redefining Risk in Railway Drainage Systems

Inadequate railway drainage can trigger flooding, accelerate track degradation, and ultimately cause the sudden failure of tracks, slopes, and embankments. Routine visual inspections score each drainage asset’s service-level on a scale of one to five, yet existing prediction studies typically assume a linear mapping between readily measured drainage-asset characteristics (e.g., pipe material, shape, slope, and local rainfall) and those ordinal service-level grades. Such linearity greatly oversimplifies the nonlinear, multifactor deterioration processes that govern drainage performance. This study introduce a risk-based redefinition of service level based on the direction and magnitude of change between consecutive inspections (low, medium, or high risk). Using this reformulated target, we build and compare three supervised machine learning models, namely, multinomial logistic regression, random forests, and artificial neural networks, to predict the drainage asset’s future risk category from its physical, environmental, and operational attributes. The modeling framework explicitly tackles practical data challenges: misclassification bias in visual grades, repeated measurements of the same asset, severe class imbalance, and the categorical nature of most variables. The approach is demonstrated on two UK main-line routes (London–Cardiff and Edinburgh–Glasgow) comprising approximately 10,000 drainage assets. After careful oversampling, random forests delivered the highest recall for high-risk assets, outperforming the linear baseline and the other nonlinear model. Results confirm that abandoning the linearity assumption, redefining risk to capture service-level dynamics and applying tailored preprocessing markedly improved predictive accuracy and interpretability. This study therefore provides railway owners with a data-driven tool to prioritize drainage maintenance and reduce network disruption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jitse4.iseng-2614
Primary Topic
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Approach to Redefining Risk in Railway Drainage Systems

Ajith Kumar Parlikad, Manu Sasidharan, Jamil Raja, Manuel Herrera et al.
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
article

Machine Learning Approach to Redefining Risk in Railway Drainage Systems

Ajith Kumar Parlikad, Manu Sasidharan, Jamil Raja, Manuel Herrera, Sho Okazaki, James McNaughton
article en

Abstract

Inadequate railway drainage can trigger flooding, accelerate track degradation, and ultimately cause the sudden failure of tracks, slopes, and embankments. Routine visual inspections score each drainage asset’s service-level on a scale of one to five, yet existing prediction studies typically assume a linear mapping between readily measured drainage-asset characteristics (e.g., pipe material, shape, slope, and local rainfall) and those ordinal service-level grades. Such linearity greatly oversimplifies the nonlinear, multifactor deterioration processes that govern drainage performance. This study introduce a risk-based redefinition of service level based on the direction and magnitude of change between consecutive inspections (low, medium, or high risk). Using this reformulated target, we build and compare three supervised machine learning models, namely, multinomial logistic regression, random forests, and artificial neural networks, to predict the drainage asset’s future risk category from its physical, environmental, and operational attributes. The modeling framework explicitly tackles practical data challenges: misclassification bias in visual grades, repeated measurements of the same asset, severe class imbalance, and the categorical nature of most variables. The approach is demonstrated on two UK main-line routes (London–Cardiff and Edinburgh–Glasgow) comprising approximately 10,000 drainage assets. After careful oversampling, random forests delivered the highest recall for high-risk assets, outperforming the linear baseline and the other nonlinear model. Results confirm that abandoning the linearity assumption, redefining risk to capture service-level dynamics and applying tailored preprocessing markedly improved predictive accuracy and interpretability. This study therefore provides railway owners with a data-driven tool to prioritize drainage maintenance and reduce network disruption.

Journal of Infrastructure SystemsVol. 32(1)
University of Cambridge (GB), University College London (GB), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Network Rail (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.