Differences in Deceleration Mechanics from Mass- vs Velocity-Dominant Impact Momentum

The purpose of this study was to determine how landing mechanics differ when impact momentum is manipulated by drop height (HEIGHT) compared to external loading (LOAD). 15 recreationally trained adults (10 males 5 females, 21.8 ± 3.5 years, 78.4 ± 13.2 kg, back squat 1RM: 127.6 ± 35.9 kg, back squat 1RM relative to mass: 1.61 ± 0.26) performed drop landings with bodyweight from 0.6 m, 0.91 m, and 1.22 m, in addition to externally loaded (via kettlebell) drop landings from 0.6 m with 16 kg, 28 kg, and 40 kg. Vertical ground reaction forces were analyzed for average force and velocity, landing depth, loading impulse, and attenuation impulse. Regression analysis was performed on each variable with respect to impact momentum with an alpha level of 0.01 (Bonferroni correction). The strongest relationships, identified by regressions with an R2 greater than 0.5, were attenuation impulse for both HEIGHT (R2= 0.839) and LOAD (R2= 0.656), and average vGRF with LOAD (R2= 0.617). Moderate relationships, identified by regressions with an R2 between 0.3 and 0.5, were loading impulse with HEIGHT (R2= 0.322), landing depth with HEIGHT (R2= 0.412), and average vGRF with HEIGHT (R2= 0.441). Weak relationships, identified by regressions with an R2 less than 0.3, were loading impulse with LOAD (R2= 0.030), landing depth with LOAD (R2= 0.149), and average velocity with HEIGHT (R2= 0.161). Loading impulse with LOAD and average velocity with LOAD were the only regressions to not be statistically significant, indicating the regression equation did not predict loading impulse better than the average across all trials. Administering the drop landing intensity with HEIGHT and LOAD led to some contrasting responses from the neuromusculoskeletal system, and future research is warranted to determine acute responses and eventual training effects, especially regarding individual joint kinetics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v6i1.387
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Deceleration Mechanics from Mass- vs Velocity-Dominant Impact Momentum

C Patterson, Trey R. Hulse, Olivia Dishno, John Harry et al.
International Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Sports Performance and Training
article

Differences in Deceleration Mechanics from Mass- vs Velocity-Dominant Impact Momentum

C Patterson, Trey R. Hulse, Olivia Dishno, John Harry, Nick Wright, Leah Marcuzzo, Leland Barker
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine how landing mechanics differ when impact momentum is manipulated by drop height (HEIGHT) compared to external loading (LOAD). 15 recreationally trained adults (10 males 5 females, 21.8 ± 3.5 years, 78.4 ± 13.2 kg, back squat 1RM: 127.6 ± 35.9 kg, back squat 1RM relative to mass: 1.61 ± 0.26) performed drop landings with bodyweight from 0.6 m, 0.91 m, and 1.22 m, in addition to externally loaded (via kettlebell) drop landings from 0.6 m with 16 kg, 28 kg, and 40 kg. Vertical ground reaction forces were analyzed for average force and velocity, landing depth, loading impulse, and attenuation impulse. Regression analysis was performed on each variable with respect to impact momentum with an alpha level of 0.01 (Bonferroni correction). The strongest relationships, identified by regressions with an R2 greater than 0.5, were attenuation impulse for both HEIGHT (R2= 0.839) and LOAD (R2= 0.656), and average vGRF with LOAD (R2= 0.617). Moderate relationships, identified by regressions with an R2 between 0.3 and 0.5, were loading impulse with HEIGHT (R2= 0.322), landing depth with HEIGHT (R2= 0.412), and average vGRF with HEIGHT (R2= 0.441). Weak relationships, identified by regressions with an R2 less than 0.3, were loading impulse with LOAD (R2= 0.030), landing depth with LOAD (R2= 0.149), and average velocity with HEIGHT (R2= 0.161). Loading impulse with LOAD and average velocity with LOAD were the only regressions to not be statistically significant, indicating the regression equation did not predict loading impulse better than the average across all trials. Administering the drop landing intensity with HEIGHT and LOAD led to some contrasting responses from the neuromusculoskeletal system, and future research is warranted to determine acute responses and eventual training effects, especially regarding individual joint kinetics.

International Journal of Strength and ConditioningVol. 6(1)
Creighton University (US), Texas Tech University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.