Уроки для ЄС щодо використання після-революційних відкриттів на прикладі судової реформи в Україні

The article analyses the progress and results of judicial reform in Ukraine after the Revolution of Dignity through the prism of interaction between key stakeholders – civil society, state bodies, and international partners, particularly the European Union. The study combines an analysis of scientific literature with empirical data obtained through interviews with direct participants in the reform processes after 2014. The authors trace how the window of opportunity created by mass protests and a change in the country's political course influenced institutional transformations in the field of justice. The study identifies factors that contributed to and hindered the implementation of reforms: on the one hand, public demand for the purification of the judiciary, the activation of civil society and the support of international partners, and on the other hand, resistance from the old elites, the superficial commitment of new political actors to deep transformations and the lack of proper dialogue between key stakeholders. The study concludes that the success of judicial reform in Ukraine is partial, demonstrating that even in a favorable context, systemic changes require sustained political will and effective cooperation between internal and external actors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Published
2025-12-29
Primary Topic
War, Law, and Justice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Уроки для ЄС щодо використання після-революційних відкриттів на прикладі судової реформи в Україні

Дмитро Коваль, Андрій Лациба
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
War, Law, and Justice
article

Уроки для ЄС щодо використання після-революційних відкриттів на прикладі судової реформи в Україні

Дмитро Коваль, Андрій Лациба
article en

Abstract

The article analyses the progress and results of judicial reform in Ukraine after the Revolution of Dignity through the prism of interaction between key stakeholders – civil society, state bodies, and international partners, particularly the European Union. The study combines an analysis of scientific literature with empirical data obtained through interviews with direct participants in the reform processes after 2014. The authors trace how the window of opportunity created by mass protests and a change in the country's political course influenced institutional transformations in the field of justice. The study identifies factors that contributed to and hindered the implementation of reforms: on the one hand, public demand for the purification of the judiciary, the activation of civil society and the support of international partners, and on the other hand, resistance from the old elites, the superficial commitment of new political actors to deep transformations and the lack of proper dialogue between key stakeholders. The study concludes that the success of judicial reform in Ukraine is partial, demonstrating that even in a favorable context, systemic changes require sustained political will and effective cooperation between internal and external actors.

The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
War, Law, and Justice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.