Наукометрична та бібліометрична діяльність як важливі напрямки роботи університетських бібліотек (про методологію вивчення та оцінювання наукової діяльності в Азербайджані)

Objective. The study aims to transfer the existing experience of scientific libraries in evaluating scientific information into the modern digital environment, to study new “evaluation standards”, and to integrate them into international practice. Methods. A synthesis of traditional methods of servicing library and information activities with modern technologies and a comparison of innovative approaches with traditions are used in the article. Results. Libraries, whether traditional, digital, or hybrid, constitute a valuable information heritage of human society. Their sustainability and ability to preserve their position in the modern information age depend largely on the correct assessment of their socio-philosophical significance. The adoption of modern methods and technologies that meet current demands enhances the attractiveness of scientific libraries. This article studies, for the first time, the methodology used in Azerbaijan to determine the National H-index and evaluates its degree of compliance with international standards. A scientific-theoretical analysis of the work carried out in 2023–2025 is conducted, and recommendations are made for the first time to enhance the role of scientific libraries in the evaluation of scientific activity. Since 2023, scientometric methods have been applied in Azerbaijan to study the rankings of scientific and higher educational institutions, as well as researchers, and to determine the National H-index. The scientific validity of this methodology and its compliance with international standards is being examined for the first time. The globalization of scientific information determines a number of international norms. These include the assessment of scientific information, the calculation of ratings, and the determination of the national Hirsch index, all of which are based on uniform standards. Experience shows that university libraries’ participation in these processes, their monitoring of scientific information circulation, and the organization of educational activities demonstrate positive efficiency. Conclusions. The growth of scientific information arrays and the need for their evaluation for management purposes is increasing every day. Scientific libraries attempt to manage this process not only through traditional methods but also by applying new digital opportunities and modern methodologies, introducing innovative evaluation tools. Gradually, consolidated international standards have been formed, and it has become important to align national projects with these standards. Expanding the participation of academic libraries in determining the National H-index is proposed. The problem involves not only processing, preserving, and providing access to scientific information but also learning to apply scientometric methods in its evaluation. It is recommended to explore broader possibilities by applying traditional bibliometric methods to the digital space.