Institutional Determinants of Academic Achievement in Biomedical Sciences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Nursing Students in Uganda

Clement Munguiko,1,2 Anne Chepngetich Koske Ngeno,2 Joseph Atukwatse,1 Safinnah Kisu Museene3 1Department of Nursing, Soroti University, Soroti City, Uganda; 2Department of Medical Education, Moi University, Eldoret City, Kenya; 3Department of Health Education and Training, Ministry of Education and Sports, Kampala, UgandaCorrespondence: Clement Munguiko, Email [email protected]: Mastery of foundational sciences namely, anatomy, physiology and biochemistry is essential for nursing competence, yet many undergraduate nursing students struggle with these courses.Objective: To investigate institutional factors influencing academic achievement in biomedical sciences among undergraduate nursing students in Uganda.Methods: A cross-sectional study, guided by the philosophy of critical realism, Input-Transformation-Output framework, and constructivist learning theory, was conducted at four purposively selected public universities in Uganda between April and June 2024. A total of 208 undergraduate nursing students were enrolled using the census approach. This study examined the influence of institutional factors on academic achievement in biomedical sciences, measured by the Grade Point Average (GPA). Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire with excellent internal consistency (α = 0.9366) and analysed using Welch’s analysis of variance and linear mixed-effects model.Results: Lower ratings of lecturer’s teaching quality (β = − 0.25, 95% CI: − 0.46, − 0.03, p = 0.03), online only teaching (β = − 0.41, 95% CI: − 0.75 − − 0.07, p = 0.02) and lack of constructive feedback (β = − 0.47, 95% CI: − 0.90, − 0.03, p = 0.046) were associated with lower GPA scores, while Problem Based Learning (β = 0.48, 95% CI: − 0.05– 1.91, p = 0.04) and good lecturer-student relationship (β = 0.34, 95% CI: − 0.06 to 0.62, p = 0.03) predicted higher GPA scores.Conclusion and Recommendations: Lower teaching quality, lack of feedback, and online only instruction were linked to lower GPA scores, while problem-based learning and good lecturer-student relationships predicted higher achievement. Therefore, nursing programs should prioritize strengthening lecturer’s teaching skills, providing constructive feedback, fostering positive lecturer-student relationship, and integrating Problem Based and blended teaching approaches to improve students’ academic outcomes.Keywords: sociodemographic factors, academic achievement, biomedical sciences, nursing education

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional Determinants of Academic Achievement in Biomedical Sciences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Nursing Students in Uganda

Ngeno ACK, Museene SK, Atukwatse J, Munguiko C
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Nursing education and management
article

Institutional Determinants of Academic Achievement in Biomedical Sciences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Nursing Students in Uganda

Ngeno ACK, Museene SK, Atukwatse J, Munguiko C
article en

Abstract

Clement Munguiko,1,2 Anne Chepngetich Koske Ngeno,2 Joseph Atukwatse,1 Safinnah Kisu Museene3 1Department of Nursing, Soroti University, Soroti City, Uganda; 2Department of Medical Education, Moi University, Eldoret City, Kenya; 3Department of Health Education and Training, Ministry of Education and Sports, Kampala, UgandaCorrespondence: Clement Munguiko, Email [email protected]: Mastery of foundational sciences namely, anatomy, physiology and biochemistry is essential for nursing competence, yet many undergraduate nursing students struggle with these courses.Objective: To investigate institutional factors influencing academic achievement in biomedical sciences among undergraduate nursing students in Uganda.Methods: A cross-sectional study, guided by the philosophy of critical realism, Input-Transformation-Output framework, and constructivist learning theory, was conducted at four purposively selected public universities in Uganda between April and June 2024. A total of 208 undergraduate nursing students were enrolled using the census approach. This study examined the influence of institutional factors on academic achievement in biomedical sciences, measured by the Grade Point Average (GPA). Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire with excellent internal consistency (α = 0.9366) and analysed using Welch’s analysis of variance and linear mixed-effects model.Results: Lower ratings of lecturer’s teaching quality (β = − 0.25, 95% CI: − 0.46, − 0.03, p = 0.03), online only teaching (β = − 0.41, 95% CI: − 0.75 − − 0.07, p = 0.02) and lack of constructive feedback (β = − 0.47, 95% CI: − 0.90, − 0.03, p = 0.046) were associated with lower GPA scores, while Problem Based Learning (β = 0.48, 95% CI: − 0.05– 1.91, p = 0.04) and good lecturer-student relationship (β = 0.34, 95% CI: − 0.06 to 0.62, p = 0.03) predicted higher GPA scores.Conclusion and Recommendations: Lower teaching quality, lack of feedback, and online only instruction were linked to lower GPA scores, while problem-based learning and good lecturer-student relationships predicted higher achievement. Therefore, nursing programs should prioritize strengthening lecturer’s teaching skills, providing constructive feedback, fostering positive lecturer-student relationship, and integrating Problem Based and blended teaching approaches to improve students’ academic outcomes.Keywords: sociodemographic factors, academic achievement, biomedical sciences, nursing education

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Community Medical Center (US), Centre for Nursing Innovation (GB), Department of Education and Training (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.