Судові провадження щодо геноциду в Міжнародному кримінальному суді: виклики встановлення фактів, український кейс та стандарти ЄСПЛ

The prosecution of genocide in the International Criminal Court (ICC) presents significant challenges in fact-finding, evidence collection, and legal interpretation. This article examines the complexities of proving genocidal intent, the admissibility of evidence, and the role of international cooperation in ensuring accountability. A particular focus is placed on the Ukrainian case, analyzing the legal and procedural hurdles in establishing genocide under the Rome Statute. Furthermore, the study explores the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) standards relevant to genocide trials, emphasizing the intersection between human rights law and international criminal justice. By comparing ICC and ECHR approaches, this research highlights the necessity for robust investigative mechanisms, witness protection, and compliance with due process standards. The findings underscore the importance of strengthening international legal frameworks to enhance the effectiveness of genocide prosecutions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Published
2025-12-29
Primary Topic
War, Law, and Justice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Судові провадження щодо геноциду в Міжнародному кримінальному суді: виклики встановлення фактів, український кейс та стандарти ЄСПЛ

ОЛЕКСАНДР ДРОЗДОВ, Олена Дроздова, Ірина Басиста
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
War, Law, and Justice
article

Судові провадження щодо геноциду в Міжнародному кримінальному суді: виклики встановлення фактів, український кейс та стандарти ЄСПЛ

ОЛЕКСАНДР ДРОЗДОВ, Олена Дроздова, Ірина Басиста
article en

Abstract

The prosecution of genocide in the International Criminal Court (ICC) presents significant challenges in fact-finding, evidence collection, and legal interpretation. This article examines the complexities of proving genocidal intent, the admissibility of evidence, and the role of international cooperation in ensuring accountability. A particular focus is placed on the Ukrainian case, analyzing the legal and procedural hurdles in establishing genocide under the Rome Statute. Furthermore, the study explores the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) standards relevant to genocide trials, emphasizing the intersection between human rights law and international criminal justice. By comparing ICC and ECHR approaches, this research highlights the necessity for robust investigative mechanisms, witness protection, and compliance with due process standards. The findings underscore the importance of strengthening international legal frameworks to enhance the effectiveness of genocide prosecutions.

The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
War, Law, and Justice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.