“A tool to support, not replace”: patient and general practitioner perceptions of digital decision support tools for back pain

Our findings highlight opportunities to integrate digital decision-support tools at multiple points in GPs' workflows-before, during, and after consultations-to address the needs of both patients with back pain and GPs. When used before consultations, such tools can help patients prepare by increasing their knowledge, supporting more productive discussions, informing decisions about whether a visit is necessary, and assisting GPs in identifying potential red flags. During consultations, the tools can provide clinicians with updates on current evidence and supply educational resources or prescriptions, particularly for evidence-based lifestyle interventions. After consultations, they can support follow-up by monitoring the patient's condition and addressing any persistent questions that may arise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Family Practice
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf098
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“A tool to support, not replace”: patient and general practitioner perceptions of digital decision support tools for back pain

James H. McAuley, Avi D. Goodman, M. L. Ryan, Isha Mishra et al.
Family Practice
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

“A tool to support, not replace”: patient and general practitioner perceptions of digital decision support tools for back pain

James H. McAuley, Avi D. Goodman, M. L. Ryan, Isha Mishra, Oyungerel Byambasuren, Gustavo E. A. P. A. Batista, Steven Marsh, Aidan G Cashin, Tianle Xie, Jennifer McBride, Rodrigo R N Rizzo
article en

Abstract

Our findings highlight opportunities to integrate digital decision-support tools at multiple points in GPs' workflows-before, during, and after consultations-to address the needs of both patients with back pain and GPs. When used before consultations, such tools can help patients prepare by increasing their knowledge, supporting more productive discussions, informing decisions about whether a visit is necessary, and assisting GPs in identifying potential red flags. During consultations, the tools can provide clinicians with updates on current evidence and supply educational resources or prescriptions, particularly for evidence-based lifestyle interventions. After consultations, they can support follow-up by monitoring the patient's condition and addressing any persistent questions that may arise.

Family PracticeVol. 43(1)
Bond University (AU), New South Wales Department of Health (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Neuroscience Research Australia (AU)
Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“A tool to support, not replace”: patient and general practitioner perceptions of digital decision support tools for back pain — James H. McAuley, Avi D. Goodman, et al. · Family Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS