Failure Modes of Machine Learning–Based Content Moderation Systems: An Analysis of False Positives, False Negatives, Coordinated Abuse, and Adversarial Synthetic Media

The attached file is a research paper titled "Failure Modes of Machine Learning-Based Content Moderation Systems: An Analysis of False Positives, False Negatives, Coordinated Abuse, and Adversarial Synthetic Media." This paper examines systematic failures in deployed ML moderation systems despite accuracy improvements. The paper analyzes issues like false positives/negatives, coordinated abuse, and deepfakes, framing moderation as a policy-driven adversarial challenge rather than simple classification. It introduces a practitioner taxonomy for failures due to distribution shifts and ambiguity, proposing mitigations such as human-in-the-loop processes and risk-tiered enforcement. Limitations of accuracy metrics are critiqued, advocating policy-aware frameworks for Trust & Safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18103651
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure Modes of Machine Learning–Based Content Moderation Systems: An Analysis of False Positives, False Negatives, Coordinated Abuse, and Adversarial Synthetic Media

Mohammad Mohsin Naeem
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Failure Modes of Machine Learning–Based Content Moderation Systems: An Analysis of False Positives, False Negatives, Coordinated Abuse, and Adversarial Synthetic Media

Mohammad Mohsin Naeem
article en

Abstract

The attached file is a research paper titled "Failure Modes of Machine Learning-Based Content Moderation Systems: An Analysis of False Positives, False Negatives, Coordinated Abuse, and Adversarial Synthetic Media." This paper examines systematic failures in deployed ML moderation systems despite accuracy improvements. The paper analyzes issues like false positives/negatives, coordinated abuse, and deepfakes, framing moderation as a policy-driven adversarial challenge rather than simple classification. It introduces a practitioner taxonomy for failures due to distribution shifts and ambiguity, proposing mitigations such as human-in-the-loop processes and risk-tiered enforcement. Limitations of accuracy metrics are critiqued, advocating policy-aware frameworks for Trust & Safety.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.