Spectral Determinants and the BSD Conjecture

This manuscript reorganizes a determinant-line formulation of the Birch and Swinnerton–Dyer (BSD) comparison into a modular proof pipeline with explicit input/output contracts. The goal is not to bypass the Tate–Shafarevich group, but to place it in the correct canonical container — the Selmer/Bloch–Kato determinant line equipped with its integral lattices — and to separate “normalization/rigidity closure” from any arithmetic finiteness upgrades. Core architecture The argument is presented in two layers: 1) Facade layer (communication view): Spectral side: produces a canonical determinant-line germ at the special point using modular-symbol and period data. Arithmetic side: the canonical Selmer/Bloch–Kato determinant line target (not “Mordell–Weil without Tate–Shafarevich”). Locking mechanism: transports the spectral germ into the arithmetic container and isolates the residual mismatch as a single scalar parameter. 2) Mechanism layer (five-module pipeline): Local Arithmetic Interface: fixes local conventions and removes all non-selected-prime valuation freedom from the comparison scalar. Spectral Matching Engine: constructs the spectral determinant-line germ. Determinant-Line Transport: performs the transport and defines a single global mismatch scalar. Unit-Rigidity Closure: collapses the mismatch scalar to a sign and fixes the sign canonically via archimedean calibration, yielding a locked identity. Arithmetic Finiteness Upgrade (optional): upgrades the locked determinant-line identity to lattice-index and classical BSD-factor statements only when an external arithmetic finiteness/control package is supplied (for example, standard rank 0/1 regimes or suitable Iwasawa/Euler-system inputs). Main unconditional contribution Under the explicitly stated unit-rigidity admissibility contract, and assuming an integral transport condition at one “locking prime” (a single lattice-integrality input sufficient to eliminate any remaining prime-power scaling), the manuscript proves a unit-rigidity locking theorem: after local normalizations, the transported spectral trivialization matches the arithmetic reference trivialization with no residual unit ambiguity. As a result, any remaining discrepancy cannot be attributed to normalization choices and must live purely at the integral/lattice index level inside the Selmer determinant-line container. What is not claimed The manuscript does not claim new unconditional finiteness results for the Tate–Shafarevich group. Any conversion from “determinant-line defect” to “cardinality of Tate–Shafarevich” is isolated in the optional upgrade module and requires imported arithmetic input. This separation is deliberate and referee-safe: the paper pinpoints exactly where Tate–Shafarevich-type information can enter (as an integral index) and keeps it logically separate from the unit-locking mechanism. Intended audience and use The work is intended for readers familiar with determinant functors, Selmer complexes, and modern BSD/ETNC-style frameworks, and it is structured to support modular verification: each module can be checked independently, and the dependency map records precisely where each hypothesis is used.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18109860
Primary Topic
Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spectral Determinants and the BSD Conjecture

Giedrius Keraitis
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
article

Spectral Determinants and the BSD Conjecture

Giedrius Keraitis
article en

Abstract

This manuscript reorganizes a determinant-line formulation of the Birch and Swinnerton–Dyer (BSD) comparison into a modular proof pipeline with explicit input/output contracts. The goal is not to bypass the Tate–Shafarevich group, but to place it in the correct canonical container — the Selmer/Bloch–Kato determinant line equipped with its integral lattices — and to separate “normalization/rigidity closure” from any arithmetic finiteness upgrades. Core architecture The argument is presented in two layers: 1) Facade layer (communication view): Spectral side: produces a canonical determinant-line germ at the special point using modular-symbol and period data. Arithmetic side: the canonical Selmer/Bloch–Kato determinant line target (not “Mordell–Weil without Tate–Shafarevich”). Locking mechanism: transports the spectral germ into the arithmetic container and isolates the residual mismatch as a single scalar parameter. 2) Mechanism layer (five-module pipeline): Local Arithmetic Interface: fixes local conventions and removes all non-selected-prime valuation freedom from the comparison scalar. Spectral Matching Engine: constructs the spectral determinant-line germ. Determinant-Line Transport: performs the transport and defines a single global mismatch scalar. Unit-Rigidity Closure: collapses the mismatch scalar to a sign and fixes the sign canonically via archimedean calibration, yielding a locked identity. Arithmetic Finiteness Upgrade (optional): upgrades the locked determinant-line identity to lattice-index and classical BSD-factor statements only when an external arithmetic finiteness/control package is supplied (for example, standard rank 0/1 regimes or suitable Iwasawa/Euler-system inputs). Main unconditional contribution Under the explicitly stated unit-rigidity admissibility contract, and assuming an integral transport condition at one “locking prime” (a single lattice-integrality input sufficient to eliminate any remaining prime-power scaling), the manuscript proves a unit-rigidity locking theorem: after local normalizations, the transported spectral trivialization matches the arithmetic reference trivialization with no residual unit ambiguity. As a result, any remaining discrepancy cannot be attributed to normalization choices and must live purely at the integral/lattice index level inside the Selmer determinant-line container. What is not claimed The manuscript does not claim new unconditional finiteness results for the Tate–Shafarevich group. Any conversion from “determinant-line defect” to “cardinality of Tate–Shafarevich” is isolated in the optional upgrade module and requires imported arithmetic input. This separation is deliberate and referee-safe: the paper pinpoints exactly where Tate–Shafarevich-type information can enter (as an integral index) and keeps it logically separate from the unit-locking mechanism. Intended audience and use The work is intended for readers familiar with determinant functors, Selmer complexes, and modern BSD/ETNC-style frameworks, and it is structured to support modular verification: each module can be checked independently, and the dependency map records precisely where each hypothesis is used.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.