Predicting Postoperative Discharge Status and Readmissions in Spinal Metastatic Disease Using Machine Learning Models

Operative management of spinal metastatic disease is largely for symptom palliation rather than curative and revolves around the expectation that postoperative survival will exceed recovery time. While several scoring systems and models to predict survival exist, few studies have unified diverse predictors into integrated models to predict short-term postoperative outcomes as indicators of recovery.The Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database and the accompanying Medicare Supplement were queried for adult patients receiving surgery for extradural spinal metastatic disease between 2006 and 2023. Primary outcomes of interest were non-home discharge (NHD) and unplanned 90-day postdischarge readmission. Inpatient length of stay (LOS) was assessed as a secondary outcome. Five models (Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, Neural Network, Random Forest, and Penalized Logistic Regression) were trained on a 70% training sample and validated on the withheld 30%.A total of 1,926 patients were included. Thoracic spine localization (vs. cervical, odds ratio [OR]: 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.74-4.58]) was associated with higher odds, while postresection arthrodesis (vs. no arthrodesis, OR = 1.24, [0.59-0.97]) and intraoperative neuromonitoring (vs. not, OR = 0.45, [0.31-0.66]) were associated with lower odds, of NHD. Utilizing a combined anterior and posterior approach (vs. anterior, OR = 0.50, [0.33-0.75]) and arthrodesis (OR = 0.96, [0.75-1.23]) were associated with lower odds of 90-day readmission. Similarly, using intraoperative neuromonitoring (B = - 1.84, [-2.72, -0.97]) or operating microscope (vs. not, B = - 1.71, [-2.66, -0.76]), postresection arthrodesis (B = - 0.17 [-2.66, -0.76]) were associated with shorter LOS, while thoracic localization (B = 1.67, [0.57, 2.76]) was associated with extended LOS. The random forest algorithm demonstrated the best overall predictive performance in the withheld validation cohort when assessing NHD (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.68, calibration slope = 0.82) and unplanned 90-day readmission (AUC = 0.67, calibration slope = 0.87).We developed and validated parsimonious predictive models to estimate the risk of NHD and 90-day readmission after surgery for extradural spinal metastatic disease. After integration into physician- and patient-facing interfaces, these models may serve as clinically useful decision tools to enhance prognostication and management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A Central European Neurosurgery
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2726-3336
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Postoperative Discharge Status and Readmissions in Spinal Metastatic Disease Using Machine Learning Models

Renuka Chintapalli, Atman Desai, Philip Heesen
Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A Central European Neurosurgery
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Predicting Postoperative Discharge Status and Readmissions in Spinal Metastatic Disease Using Machine Learning Models

Renuka Chintapalli, Atman Desai, Philip Heesen
article en

Abstract

Operative management of spinal metastatic disease is largely for symptom palliation rather than curative and revolves around the expectation that postoperative survival will exceed recovery time. While several scoring systems and models to predict survival exist, few studies have unified diverse predictors into integrated models to predict short-term postoperative outcomes as indicators of recovery.The Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database and the accompanying Medicare Supplement were queried for adult patients receiving surgery for extradural spinal metastatic disease between 2006 and 2023. Primary outcomes of interest were non-home discharge (NHD) and unplanned 90-day postdischarge readmission. Inpatient length of stay (LOS) was assessed as a secondary outcome. Five models (Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, Neural Network, Random Forest, and Penalized Logistic Regression) were trained on a 70% training sample and validated on the withheld 30%.A total of 1,926 patients were included. Thoracic spine localization (vs. cervical, odds ratio [OR]: 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.74-4.58]) was associated with higher odds, while postresection arthrodesis (vs. no arthrodesis, OR = 1.24, [0.59-0.97]) and intraoperative neuromonitoring (vs. not, OR = 0.45, [0.31-0.66]) were associated with lower odds, of NHD. Utilizing a combined anterior and posterior approach (vs. anterior, OR = 0.50, [0.33-0.75]) and arthrodesis (OR = 0.96, [0.75-1.23]) were associated with lower odds of 90-day readmission. Similarly, using intraoperative neuromonitoring (B = - 1.84, [-2.72, -0.97]) or operating microscope (vs. not, B = - 1.71, [-2.66, -0.76]), postresection arthrodesis (B = - 0.17 [-2.66, -0.76]) were associated with shorter LOS, while thoracic localization (B = 1.67, [0.57, 2.76]) was associated with extended LOS. The random forest algorithm demonstrated the best overall predictive performance in the withheld validation cohort when assessing NHD (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.68, calibration slope = 0.82) and unplanned 90-day readmission (AUC = 0.67, calibration slope = 0.87).We developed and validated parsimonious predictive models to estimate the risk of NHD and 90-day readmission after surgery for extradural spinal metastatic disease. After integration into physician- and patient-facing interfaces, these models may serve as clinically useful decision tools to enhance prognostication and management.

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A Central European Neurosurgery
University of Zurich (CH), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.