DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MRI PI-RADS TO DIAGNOSE PROSTATE CANCER, KEEPING HISTOPATHOLOGY AS GOLD STANDARD

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI using PI-RADS v2 in a prospective study, with histopathology as the reference standard. METHODOLOGY This prospective single-centre diagnostic accuracy study was conducted between January 2022 and June 2023 in the Department of Radiology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan, in accordance with STARD guidelines. A total of 127 men (aged 40-85 years) with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA >4 ng/dL) and abnormal digital rectal examination findings were enrolled by a consecutive sampling method. The study was conducted at the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, over a period of 6 months. All participants underwent mpMRI with PI-RADS scoring followed by systematic prostate biopsy. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as a Gleason score ≥7. Diagnostic accuracy metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy, were calculated. RESULTS Prostate cancer was histopathologically confirmed in 58.3% (74/127) of patients. Using a predefined diagnostic threshold of PI-RADS ≥4 versus <4, mpMRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.2%, specificity of 81.1%, PPV of 86.8%, NPV of 84.3%, and overall accuracy of 85.8%. Performance was superior in patients with PSA >10 ng/dL (92.5% sensitivity) and for PI-RADS 5 lesions (94.7% concordance with high-grade cancer). False negatives were predominantly anterior zone tumors (75%), while false positives were primarily due to prostatitis. Inter-reader agreement was substantial (κ = 0.72). CONCLUSION In this study, mpMRI using PI-RADS v2 showed good diagnostic performance and reproducibility for detecting csPCa in a Pakistani cohort. Limitations persist in anterior zone assessment, and inflammatory mimics were observed, underscoring the need for careful interpretation and optimized biopsy strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.13-1.787
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MRI PI-RADS TO DIAGNOSE PROSTATE CANCER, KEEPING HISTOPATHOLOGY AS GOLD STANDARD

Gohar Ali, Adnan Sajid, Hafiza Ayesha Jawaid, Mahnoor Rehman Khan et al.
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MRI PI-RADS TO DIAGNOSE PROSTATE CANCER, KEEPING HISTOPATHOLOGY AS GOLD STANDARD

Gohar Ali, Adnan Sajid, Hafiza Ayesha Jawaid, Mahnoor Rehman Khan, Mehreen Khan, Muneeb Ur Rahman, Ghazala Wahid
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI using PI-RADS v2 in a prospective study, with histopathology as the reference standard. METHODOLOGY This prospective single-centre diagnostic accuracy study was conducted between January 2022 and June 2023 in the Department of Radiology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan, in accordance with STARD guidelines. A total of 127 men (aged 40-85 years) with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA >4 ng/dL) and abnormal digital rectal examination findings were enrolled by a consecutive sampling method. The study was conducted at the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, over a period of 6 months. All participants underwent mpMRI with PI-RADS scoring followed by systematic prostate biopsy. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as a Gleason score ≥7. Diagnostic accuracy metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy, were calculated. RESULTS Prostate cancer was histopathologically confirmed in 58.3% (74/127) of patients. Using a predefined diagnostic threshold of PI-RADS ≥4 versus <4, mpMRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.2%, specificity of 81.1%, PPV of 86.8%, NPV of 84.3%, and overall accuracy of 85.8%. Performance was superior in patients with PSA >10 ng/dL (92.5% sensitivity) and for PI-RADS 5 lesions (94.7% concordance with high-grade cancer). False negatives were predominantly anterior zone tumors (75%), while false positives were primarily due to prostatitis. Inter-reader agreement was substantial (κ = 0.72). CONCLUSION In this study, mpMRI using PI-RADS v2 showed good diagnostic performance and reproducibility for detecting csPCa in a Pakistani cohort. Limitations persist in anterior zone assessment, and inflammatory mimics were observed, underscoring the need for careful interpretation and optimized biopsy strategies.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Hayatabad Medical Complex (PK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.