Unifying Knowledge in Agentic LLMs: Concepts, Methods, and Recent Advancements

Large language models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in text generation and problem solving, yet they continue to face fundamental challenges such as hallucination, lack of factual grounding, and limited reasoning reliability. The core of these issues lies the question of how LLMs acquire and use knowledge. While internal knowledge embedded in model parameters enables impressive generalization, it is often insu!cient for up-to-date or domain-speci''c tasks. External knowledge integration, such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), provides grounding and factuality but introduces challenges of retrieval quality, latency, and reliability. Beyond these paradigms, recent advances in agentic LLMs extend models from passive generators to active problem solvers that can reason, plan, and interact with external tools. This survey provides a uni''ed, knowledge-centric perspective on LLMs, organized along three complementary dimensions: (i) reactive: internal knowledge, (ii) lightly-active: external knowledge, and (iii) proactive: agentic knowledge utilization for reasoning and tool interaction. We provide a taxonomy of knowledge usage in LLMs, analyze their respective strengths and limitations, and highlight how these paradigms interact in real-world systems. Finally, we identify open challenges to facilitate future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3787470.3787478
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unifying Knowledge in Agentic LLMs: Concepts, Methods, and Recent Advancements

Lihui Liu, Kai Shu
ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter
Topic Modeling
article

Unifying Knowledge in Agentic LLMs: Concepts, Methods, and Recent Advancements

Lihui Liu, Kai Shu
article en

Abstract

Large language models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in text generation and problem solving, yet they continue to face fundamental challenges such as hallucination, lack of factual grounding, and limited reasoning reliability. The core of these issues lies the question of how LLMs acquire and use knowledge. While internal knowledge embedded in model parameters enables impressive generalization, it is often insu!cient for up-to-date or domain-speci''c tasks. External knowledge integration, such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), provides grounding and factuality but introduces challenges of retrieval quality, latency, and reliability. Beyond these paradigms, recent advances in agentic LLMs extend models from passive generators to active problem solvers that can reason, plan, and interact with external tools. This survey provides a uni''ed, knowledge-centric perspective on LLMs, organized along three complementary dimensions: (i) reactive: internal knowledge, (ii) lightly-active: external knowledge, and (iii) proactive: agentic knowledge utilization for reasoning and tool interaction. We provide a taxonomy of knowledge usage in LLMs, analyze their respective strengths and limitations, and highlight how these paradigms interact in real-world systems. Finally, we identify open challenges to facilitate future research.

ACM SIGKDD Explorations NewsletterVol. 27(2)
Emory University (US), Wayne State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.