Caregivers and Their Support Networks. Who Supports Whom? Different Models of Informal Networks

Increases in life expectancy mean that more elderly people require care. This has significant implications for carers, who are typically women belonging to the so-called ‘sandwich generation’. This research, which formed part of a national mixed-methods study conducted in Italy between 2024 and 2025, aimed to identify the role of informal social relationships in supporting carers of older people. Data were collected from twenty caregiver-supporter dyads, in which the caregivers were aged between 50 and 65. In the first of two online interviews, the caregivers were interviewed using social network analysis tools to identify their support networks (i.e. the network structural data). In the second interview, qualitative data were gathered from the caregiver and their prime supporter (for example, a spouse, relative, or friend), and evaluated using thematic and template analysis. The results emphasise the variety of caregiving network models (for example, low-density large networks; high-density large networks; and low-density small networks) and the different roles caregivers can play within their networks. Their role depends on the type of support their receive. However, even caregivers situated within large functional networks may find that their resources are insufficient. These findings suggest that open networks and ‘bridging social capital’ contribute to greater well-being in both the caregivers and their supporters. Thus, promoting and preserving bridging social capital is crucial to enhancing the well-being of all actors involved in informal caregiving.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Verona
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v15i14(s).1053
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caregivers and Their Support Networks. Who Supports Whom? Different Models of Informal Networks

Marco Carradore, Donatella Bramanti
Università degli Studi di Verona
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Caregivers and Their Support Networks. Who Supports Whom? Different Models of Informal Networks

Marco Carradore, Donatella Bramanti
article en

Abstract

Increases in life expectancy mean that more elderly people require care. This has significant implications for carers, who are typically women belonging to the so-called ‘sandwich generation’. This research, which formed part of a national mixed-methods study conducted in Italy between 2024 and 2025, aimed to identify the role of informal social relationships in supporting carers of older people. Data were collected from twenty caregiver-supporter dyads, in which the caregivers were aged between 50 and 65. In the first of two online interviews, the caregivers were interviewed using social network analysis tools to identify their support networks (i.e. the network structural data). In the second interview, qualitative data were gathered from the caregiver and their prime supporter (for example, a spouse, relative, or friend), and evaluated using thematic and template analysis. The results emphasise the variety of caregiving network models (for example, low-density large networks; high-density large networks; and low-density small networks) and the different roles caregivers can play within their networks. Their role depends on the type of support their receive. However, even caregivers situated within large functional networks may find that their resources are insufficient. These findings suggest that open networks and ‘bridging social capital’ contribute to greater well-being in both the caregivers and their supporters. Thus, promoting and preserving bridging social capital is crucial to enhancing the well-being of all actors involved in informal caregiving.

Università degli Studi di Verona
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.