Algorithmic Entrapment the Silent Erosion of User Autonomy and Mental Health.

Recent developments in the study of highly visual social media have highlighted that, far from being neutral conduits, adolescents' online environments might be curated by recommender systems that learn from behaviour. On this view, risk and benefit may depend less on time spent online than on patterns of exposure ‒ what reaches young people, how they meet it, and when in development contact occurs. For instance, in large adolescent cohorts, only 10-15% of users account for most of the association between use and distress, underscoring the relevance of heterogeneity. Similar feeds might support connection and care while, in susceptible users, amplifying appearance-centred comparison, compulsive use and contact with harmful material. A public-health perspective treats personalisation as an upstream determinant and invites proportionate responsibilities, namely transparency, independent audit and safety-by-design. Clinically, brief assessments that separate time from type of engagement, paired with low-burden, mechanism-focused interventions, could offer practical steps. Taken together, a precautionary and balanced stance should aim at keeping what is valuable online while reducing foreseeable harm through accountable design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250602
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Entrapment the Silent Erosion of User Autonomy and Mental Health.

Donatella Marazziti, Federico Mucci, Leon Donadoni
PubMed
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Algorithmic Entrapment the Silent Erosion of User Autonomy and Mental Health.

Donatella Marazziti, Federico Mucci, Leon Donadoni
article en

Abstract

Recent developments in the study of highly visual social media have highlighted that, far from being neutral conduits, adolescents' online environments might be curated by recommender systems that learn from behaviour. On this view, risk and benefit may depend less on time spent online than on patterns of exposure ‒ what reaches young people, how they meet it, and when in development contact occurs. For instance, in large adolescent cohorts, only 10-15% of users account for most of the association between use and distress, underscoring the relevance of heterogeneity. Similar feeds might support connection and care while, in susceptible users, amplifying appearance-centred comparison, compulsive use and contact with harmful material. A public-health perspective treats personalisation as an upstream determinant and invites proportionate responsibilities, namely transparency, independent audit and safety-by-design. Clinically, brief assessments that separate time from type of engagement, paired with low-burden, mechanism-focused interventions, could offer practical steps. Taken together, a precautionary and balanced stance should aim at keeping what is valuable online while reducing foreseeable harm through accountable design.

PubMedVol. 22(6)
University of Pisa (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.