Workplace governance and labor perceptions of technological risks and benefits

Abstract This paper examines the connection between emerging workplace technologies and workers’ preferences, actions, and mobilization. Some workers organize against innovations in the workplace because they fear that the deployment of emerging technologies could exacerbate inequality. But more often, workers adopt or acquiesce to emerging technologies. Our paper argues that understanding workers’ responses (and non-responses) to technology requires taking the work context seriously. Drawing on interdisciplinary research, it conceptualizes different forms of workplace power that moderate the consequences of technological adoption, connecting these forms of power to various dimensions of workers’ preferences. It then reflects upon the methodological challenges of studying preferences and power. The analysis underscores the need for mid-level theoretical and empirical research of work contexts to advance the agenda on inclusive innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Corporate Change
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaf059
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Workplace governance and labor perceptions of technological risks and benefits

Jane Gingrich, Nicole Wu, Baobao Zhang
Industrial and Corporate Change
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Workplace governance and labor perceptions of technological risks and benefits

Jane Gingrich, Nicole Wu, Baobao Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the connection between emerging workplace technologies and workers’ preferences, actions, and mobilization. Some workers organize against innovations in the workplace because they fear that the deployment of emerging technologies could exacerbate inequality. But more often, workers adopt or acquiesce to emerging technologies. Our paper argues that understanding workers’ responses (and non-responses) to technology requires taking the work context seriously. Drawing on interdisciplinary research, it conceptualizes different forms of workplace power that moderate the consequences of technological adoption, connecting these forms of power to various dimensions of workers’ preferences. It then reflects upon the methodological challenges of studying preferences and power. The analysis underscores the need for mid-level theoretical and empirical research of work contexts to advance the agenda on inclusive innovation.

Industrial and Corporate ChangeVol. 35(1)
University of Toronto (CA), Oxford Policy Management (GB), Syracuse University (US), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Workplace governance and labor perceptions of technological risks and benefits — Jane Gingrich, Nicole Wu, et al. · Industrial and Corporate Change (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS