Setting research priorities for cancer in India: Findings from a CHNRI exercise by ICMR & AIIMS-NCI

Background & objectives With limited funding and vast array of research ideas, setting priorities becomes essential to ensure effective and efficient use of resources. This study aims to systematically identify key research questions in cancer through stakeholder engagement using the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative method which is a new concept in the Indian context. Methods The Indian Council of Medical Research held a research priority-setting exercise on May 7-8, 2024 at All India Institute of Medical Sciences-National Cancer Institute, Jhajjar, Haryana, engaging 84 participants across India using CHNRI methodology. Experts were divided into four thematic groups. In Step I, each group proposed research questions, which were scored based on five predefined criteria (answerability, efficacy, relevance, deliverability, equity) and arranged in descending order. In Step II, the highest-scoring questions were further validated through full-house voting. Questions receiving a consensus of more than two-third were finalised as priorities. Results In Step I, 99 questions were generated which covered descriptive (n=10), development (n=65), discovery (n=14), and delivery research (n=10). Development group questions were subcategorised as Technologies (diagnostics/devices/digital) (n=17), Therapeutics (n=16), Prevention and screening (n=20), and Palliative care and survivorship (n=12). During validation (Step II), 36 questions across all domains received >66 per cent scores, resulting in research priorities. Interpretation & conclusions The priority setting exercise helped in short listing research questions in area of cancer in India and provided actionable guidance to policymakers and funders enabling appropriate usage of limited funds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Indian Journal of Medical Research
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/ijmr_1246_2025
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Setting research priorities for cancer in India: Findings from a CHNRI exercise by ICMR & AIIMS-NCI

Mausumi Bharadwaj, Pramit Ghosh, Rupinder Singh Dhaliwal, Neelam Shirsat et al.
The Indian Journal of Medical Research
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Setting research priorities for cancer in India: Findings from a CHNRI exercise by ICMR & AIIMS-NCI

Mausumi Bharadwaj, Pramit Ghosh, Rupinder Singh Dhaliwal, Neelam Shirsat, Saritha Shamsunder, NS Chatterjee, Shalini Singh, Sudeep Gupta, Alok Thakar, GK Rath, Neerja Bhatla, Taruna Madan Gupta, Jitendra Kumar Meena, Ajaykiran Shashikiran Chavan, Jyoti Sharma, Tanvir Kaur, Sushma Bhatnagar, Prashant Mathur
article en

Abstract

Background & objectives With limited funding and vast array of research ideas, setting priorities becomes essential to ensure effective and efficient use of resources. This study aims to systematically identify key research questions in cancer through stakeholder engagement using the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative method which is a new concept in the Indian context. Methods The Indian Council of Medical Research held a research priority-setting exercise on May 7-8, 2024 at All India Institute of Medical Sciences-National Cancer Institute, Jhajjar, Haryana, engaging 84 participants across India using CHNRI methodology. Experts were divided into four thematic groups. In Step I, each group proposed research questions, which were scored based on five predefined criteria (answerability, efficacy, relevance, deliverability, equity) and arranged in descending order. In Step II, the highest-scoring questions were further validated through full-house voting. Questions receiving a consensus of more than two-third were finalised as priorities. Results In Step I, 99 questions were generated which covered descriptive (n=10), development (n=65), discovery (n=14), and delivery research (n=10). Development group questions were subcategorised as Technologies (diagnostics/devices/digital) (n=17), Therapeutics (n=16), Prevention and screening (n=20), and Palliative care and survivorship (n=12). During validation (Step II), 36 questions across all domains received >66 per cent scores, resulting in research priorities. Interpretation & conclusions The priority setting exercise helped in short listing research questions in area of cancer in India and provided actionable guidance to policymakers and funders enabling appropriate usage of limited funds.

The Indian Journal of Medical ResearchVol. 162(5)
Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital (IN), Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN), Tata Memorial Hospital (IN), Indian Council of Medical Research (IN), National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (IN), Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (IN), National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.