The Huns in the Cimmerian Bosphorus

The history of the Cimmerian Bosporus in the Hun Period (last third of the 4th–second third of the 5th century) remains largely unknown. Hun-style artefacts in the Eastern Crimea and the Taman Peninsula (arrowheads, bone bow plates, some sword types, and a diadem) and the presence of elements of burial ritual elements characteristic of the steppe zone (the placement of saddles and arrows into the grave, accompanying horse graves) in the funerary practice of the Bosporan population from the late 4th–mid-5th century are scarce evidence, reflecting only an episodic presence of Huns in the Cimmerian Bosporus. These artefacts and phenomena were associated primarily with the ‘elite’ and ‘military’ strata and, apparently, did not reach the bulk of the Hellenised population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communicationes Archaeologicae Hungariae
Published
2025-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54640/cah.2025.347
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Huns in the Cimmerian Bosphorus

Michel Kazanski
1 citations
Communicationes Archaeologicae Hungariae
Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
8.27
article

The Huns in the Cimmerian Bosphorus

Michel Kazanski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The history of the Cimmerian Bosporus in the Hun Period (last third of the 4th–second third of the 5th century) remains largely unknown. Hun-style artefacts in the Eastern Crimea and the Taman Peninsula (arrowheads, bone bow plates, some sword types, and a diadem) and the presence of elements of burial ritual elements characteristic of the steppe zone (the placement of saddles and arrows into the grave, accompanying horse graves) in the funerary practice of the Bosporan population from the late 4th–mid-5th century are scarce evidence, reflecting only an episodic presence of Huns in the Cimmerian Bosporus. These artefacts and phenomena were associated primarily with the ‘elite’ and ‘military’ strata and, apparently, did not reach the bulk of the Hellenised population.

Communicationes Archaeologicae HungariaeVol. 2025
Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée (FR), Archéorient (FR), Orient & Méditerranée (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
8.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.