Narrating a Life, Claiming a Voice: Autobiography and the Question of Agency in Biographical Writing

This article critically examines the influence of autobiographical material on biographical narratives and proposes the approach of life writing as a methodological and conceptual alternative. Autobiographies, due to their ideological, selective, and narrative nature, often impose a coherent and persuasive framework on the biographer, thereby blurring the boundaries between historical analysis and autobiographical fiction. This tension complicates the interplay between identity construction and historical context. Life writing, by incorporating a broad array of ego-documents, offers a multidimensional and interdisciplinary perspective that reconfigures biography as a critical, pluralistic, and reflexive practice. It emphasizes not only what is narrated but also how it is narrated—focusing on narrative strategies, silences, linguistic choices, and the subject's social positions. In this framework, the article reconsiders the nature of biographical subjects and seeks a renewed answer to the central question: “Whose story is being told?”

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18110589
Primary Topic
Autobiographical and Biographical Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narrating a Life, Claiming a Voice: Autobiography and the Question of Agency in Biographical Writing

Mutlu Dursun
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Autobiographical and Biographical Writing
article

Narrating a Life, Claiming a Voice: Autobiography and the Question of Agency in Biographical Writing

Mutlu Dursun
article en

Abstract

This article critically examines the influence of autobiographical material on biographical narratives and proposes the approach of life writing as a methodological and conceptual alternative. Autobiographies, due to their ideological, selective, and narrative nature, often impose a coherent and persuasive framework on the biographer, thereby blurring the boundaries between historical analysis and autobiographical fiction. This tension complicates the interplay between identity construction and historical context. Life writing, by incorporating a broad array of ego-documents, offers a multidimensional and interdisciplinary perspective that reconfigures biography as a critical, pluralistic, and reflexive practice. It emphasizes not only what is narrated but also how it is narrated—focusing on narrative strategies, silences, linguistic choices, and the subject's social positions. In this framework, the article reconsiders the nature of biographical subjects and seeks a renewed answer to the central question: “Whose story is being told?”

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Autobiographical and Biographical Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.