Partial identification of mean achievement in ILSA studies with multi-stage stratified sample designs and student non-participation

Abstract International large-scale assessment (ILSA) studies collect information across education systems with the objective of learning about the population-wide distribution of student achievement in the assessment. In this article, we study one of the most fundamental threats that these studies face when justifying the conclusions reached about these distributions: the identification problem that arises from student non-participation during data collection. Recognizing that ILSA studies have traditionally employed a narrow range of strategies to address non-participation, we examine this problem using tools developed within the framework of partial identification of probability distributions. We tailor this framework to the problem of non-participation when data are collected using a multi-stage stratified random sample design, as in most ILSA studies. We demonstrate this approach with application to the International Computer and Information Literacy Study in 2018. We show how to use the framework to assess mean achievement under reasonable and credible sets of assumptions about the non-participating population. We also provide examples of how these results may be reported by agencies that administer ILSA studies. By doing so, we bring to the field of ILSA an alternative strategy for identification, estimation, and reporting of population parameters of interest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnaf209
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partial identification of mean achievement in ILSA studies with multi-stage stratified sample designs and student non-participation

Jeff Dominitz, Diego Alves Côrtes, Maximiliano Romero
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
School Choice and Performance
article

Partial identification of mean achievement in ILSA studies with multi-stage stratified sample designs and student non-participation

Jeff Dominitz, Diego Alves Côrtes, Maximiliano Romero
article en

Abstract

Abstract International large-scale assessment (ILSA) studies collect information across education systems with the objective of learning about the population-wide distribution of student achievement in the assessment. In this article, we study one of the most fundamental threats that these studies face when justifying the conclusions reached about these distributions: the identification problem that arises from student non-participation during data collection. Recognizing that ILSA studies have traditionally employed a narrow range of strategies to address non-participation, we examine this problem using tools developed within the framework of partial identification of probability distributions. We tailor this framework to the problem of non-participation when data are collected using a multi-stage stratified random sample design, as in most ILSA studies. We demonstrate this approach with application to the International Computer and Information Literacy Study in 2018. We show how to use the framework to assess mean achievement under reasonable and credible sets of assumptions about the non-participating population. We also provide examples of how these results may be reported by agencies that administer ILSA studies. By doing so, we bring to the field of ILSA an alternative strategy for identification, estimation, and reporting of population parameters of interest.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
Kennedy Center (DK), International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (NL), Rice University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.