A Prospective Comparative Study of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Versus Conventional Protocols in Emergency Laparoscopic Appendectomies

Background Acute appendicitis is among the most common causes of acute abdominal pain requiring surgical intervention. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become the standard of care due to its advantages in terms of reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, and early return to activity. However, optimizing perioperative recovery in emergency surgical settings remains a challenge. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, initially developed for elective colorectal surgeries, offer a multimodal approach to improving surgical outcomes and reducing recovery time. Recent studies have shown that ERAS can be safely and effectively adapted for emergency procedures as well. Objectives This study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of the ERAS protocol compared to conventional perioperative care in patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic appendectomy by comparing the length of hospital stay, return to routine activities, postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale {VAS} score), and perioperative complications between the two groups. Methods A prospective comparative study was conducted on 62 patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic appendectomy. The patients were divided into two groups: 31 received conventional postoperative care, and 31 followed ERAS protocols. The primary outcomes analyzed were the duration of hospital stay, time to return to normal activity, and postoperative pain (VAS). Results The patients in the ERAS group had significantly reduced hospital stay (1.87 ± 0.51 versus 3.16 ± 0.45 days, p < 0.001), earlier return to normal activity (3.43 ± 0.50 versus 3.97 ± 0.80 days, p = 0.003), and lower VAS scores (2.53 ± 0.51 versus 3.29 ± 0.46, p < 0.001). No complications were observed in either group. Conclusion The ERAS protocol is a safe and effective perioperative strategy in emergency laparoscopic appendectomy. Its implementation leads to significantly improved postoperative outcomes and can be considered for broader use in acute surgical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.100533
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Prospective Comparative Study of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Versus Conventional Protocols in Emergency Laparoscopic Appendectomies

Hemanth Sureshwara Ghalige, Revathy Nair Es, Nandhini Priya, Dhanush P et al.
Cureus
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

A Prospective Comparative Study of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Versus Conventional Protocols in Emergency Laparoscopic Appendectomies

Hemanth Sureshwara Ghalige, Revathy Nair Es, Nandhini Priya, Dhanush P, Arunkumar Tukaram
article en

Abstract

Background Acute appendicitis is among the most common causes of acute abdominal pain requiring surgical intervention. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become the standard of care due to its advantages in terms of reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, and early return to activity. However, optimizing perioperative recovery in emergency surgical settings remains a challenge. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, initially developed for elective colorectal surgeries, offer a multimodal approach to improving surgical outcomes and reducing recovery time. Recent studies have shown that ERAS can be safely and effectively adapted for emergency procedures as well. Objectives This study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of the ERAS protocol compared to conventional perioperative care in patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic appendectomy by comparing the length of hospital stay, return to routine activities, postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale {VAS} score), and perioperative complications between the two groups. Methods A prospective comparative study was conducted on 62 patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic appendectomy. The patients were divided into two groups: 31 received conventional postoperative care, and 31 followed ERAS protocols. The primary outcomes analyzed were the duration of hospital stay, time to return to normal activity, and postoperative pain (VAS). Results The patients in the ERAS group had significantly reduced hospital stay (1.87 ± 0.51 versus 3.16 ± 0.45 days, p < 0.001), earlier return to normal activity (3.43 ± 0.50 versus 3.97 ± 0.80 days, p = 0.003), and lower VAS scores (2.53 ± 0.51 versus 3.29 ± 0.46, p < 0.001). No complications were observed in either group. Conclusion The ERAS protocol is a safe and effective perioperative strategy in emergency laparoscopic appendectomy. Its implementation leads to significantly improved postoperative outcomes and can be considered for broader use in acute surgical care.

CureusVol. 17(12)
Employees State Insurance Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.