Are Classification Robustness and Explanation Robustness Really Strongly Correlated? An Analysis Through Input Loss Landscape

This paper looks into the critical area of deep learning robustness and challenges the common belief that classification robustness and explanation robustness in image classification systems are inherently correlated. Through a novel evaluation approach leveraging clustering for e!cient assessment of explanation robustness, we demonstrate that enhancing explanation robustness does not necessarily flatten the input loss landscape with respect to explanation loss - contrary to flattened loss landscapes indicating better classification robustness. To further investigate this contradiction, a training method designed to adjust the loss landscape with respect to explanation loss is proposed. Through the new training method, we uncover that although such adjustments can impact the robustness of explanations, they do not have an influence on the robustness of classification. These findings not only challenge the previous assumption of a strong correlation between the two forms of robustness but also pave new pathways for understanding the relationship between loss landscape and explanation loss. Codes are provided in the supplement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3787470.3787476
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Classification Robustness and Explanation Robustness Really Strongly Correlated? An Analysis Through Input Loss Landscape

T. Y. Chen, Dongsheng Luo, Linsey Pang, Wei Hua et al.
ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Are Classification Robustness and Explanation Robustness Really Strongly Correlated? An Analysis Through Input Loss Landscape

T. Y. Chen, Dongsheng Luo, Linsey Pang, Wei Hua, Wenwang Huang
article en

Abstract

This paper looks into the critical area of deep learning robustness and challenges the common belief that classification robustness and explanation robustness in image classification systems are inherently correlated. Through a novel evaluation approach leveraging clustering for e!cient assessment of explanation robustness, we demonstrate that enhancing explanation robustness does not necessarily flatten the input loss landscape with respect to explanation loss - contrary to flattened loss landscapes indicating better classification robustness. To further investigate this contradiction, a training method designed to adjust the loss landscape with respect to explanation loss is proposed. Through the new training method, we uncover that although such adjustments can impact the robustness of explanations, they do not have an influence on the robustness of classification. These findings not only challenge the previous assumption of a strong correlation between the two forms of robustness but also pave new pathways for understanding the relationship between loss landscape and explanation loss. Codes are provided in the supplement.

ACM SIGKDD Explorations NewsletterVol. 27(2)
PayPal (United States) (US), Florida International University (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.