Bridging the Privacy Accounting Gap in DP-SGD

Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is one of the most widely used algorithms for private machine learning. Due to its efficiency, most practical implementations of DP-SGD shuffle the training examples and divide them into fixed-size mini-batches during training. However, the privacy accounting typically assumes that Poisson subsampling was used, wherein each example is included in each mini-batch independently with some probability. Our first contribution is to show that there can be a substantial gap between these two versions of DP-SGD; specifically, the privacy accounting implies much stronger privacy guarantees than the implementations actually provide. As our second contribution, we propose two approaches to address this gap: (i) an implementation of Poisson subsampling using the Map-Reduce framework that can scale to large datasets that do not fit in memory and (ii) a novel Balls-and-Bins sampling that achieves the “best of both” sampling approaches. Namely, its implementation is similar to shuffling, and it leads to similar utility for DP-SGD training with similar-or-better privacy compared to Poisson subsampling in practical regimes of parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29012/jpc.998
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the Privacy Accounting Gap in DP-SGD

Pasin Manurangsi, Amer Sinha, Ethan Leeman, Ravi Kumar et al.
Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Bridging the Privacy Accounting Gap in DP-SGD

Pasin Manurangsi, Amer Sinha, Ethan Leeman, Ravi Kumar, Charlie Harrison, Pritish Kamath, Chiyuan Zhang, Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi
article en

Abstract

Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is one of the most widely used algorithms for private machine learning. Due to its efficiency, most practical implementations of DP-SGD shuffle the training examples and divide them into fixed-size mini-batches during training. However, the privacy accounting typically assumes that Poisson subsampling was used, wherein each example is included in each mini-batch independently with some probability. Our first contribution is to show that there can be a substantial gap between these two versions of DP-SGD; specifically, the privacy accounting implies much stronger privacy guarantees than the implementations actually provide. As our second contribution, we propose two approaches to address this gap: (i) an implementation of Poisson subsampling using the Map-Reduce framework that can scale to large datasets that do not fit in memory and (ii) a novel Balls-and-Bins sampling that achieves the “best of both” sampling approaches. Namely, its implementation is similar to shuffling, and it leads to similar utility for DP-SGD training with similar-or-better privacy compared to Poisson subsampling in practical regimes of parameters.

Journal of Privacy and ConfidentialityVol. 15(3)
Google (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging the Privacy Accounting Gap in DP-SGD — Pasin Manurangsi, Amer Sinha, et al. · Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS