The Bureaucratization of Fantasy and K-Pop’s Discursive Legitimation

The global ascent of K-Pop has transformed entertainment agencies into multinational corporations facing intense ESG scrutiny. Yet, a critical gap remains regarding how “merchants of fantasy” navigate the discursive tension between cultural authenticity and bureaucratic standardization since existing research largely neglects the creative industries. To address this, this study employs Critical Discourse Analysis to examine CEO messages from the “Big Four” agencies, specifically HYBE, SM, JYP, and YG, covering fiscal years 2022 to 2024. By utilizing a sociosemantic framework of legitimation strategies combined with a processual view of legitimacy, this longitudinal analysis identifies four distinct institutional logics utilized by the sample firms. These discursive strategies reflect a growing “bureaucratization of fantasy,” revealing how agencies increasingly rely on rational-legal validation to mitigate owner risk and satisfy global capital markets. Consequently, this study not only fills the gap in research on legitimation strategies within the cultural industry but also contributes to understanding how creative enterprises strategically navigate the conflict between “authenticity” and “standardization” under global ESG pressures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v15-i12/27340
Primary Topic
Asian Culture and Media Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Bureaucratization of Fantasy and K-Pop’s Discursive Legitimation

Zhang Juan, Ng Keng Yap, Lin Yihuan, Choo Wei Chong
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Asian Culture and Media Studies
article

The Bureaucratization of Fantasy and K-Pop’s Discursive Legitimation

Zhang Juan, Ng Keng Yap, Lin Yihuan, Choo Wei Chong
article en

Abstract

The global ascent of K-Pop has transformed entertainment agencies into multinational corporations facing intense ESG scrutiny. Yet, a critical gap remains regarding how “merchants of fantasy” navigate the discursive tension between cultural authenticity and bureaucratic standardization since existing research largely neglects the creative industries. To address this, this study employs Critical Discourse Analysis to examine CEO messages from the “Big Four” agencies, specifically HYBE, SM, JYP, and YG, covering fiscal years 2022 to 2024. By utilizing a sociosemantic framework of legitimation strategies combined with a processual view of legitimacy, this longitudinal analysis identifies four distinct institutional logics utilized by the sample firms. These discursive strategies reflect a growing “bureaucratization of fantasy,” revealing how agencies increasingly rely on rational-legal validation to mitigate owner risk and satisfy global capital markets. Consequently, this study not only fills the gap in research on legitimation strategies within the cultural industry but also contributes to understanding how creative enterprises strategically navigate the conflict between “authenticity” and “standardization” under global ESG pressures.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social SciencesVol. 15(12)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Asian Culture and Media Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Bureaucratization of Fantasy and K-Pop’s Discursive Legitimation — Zhang Juan, Ng Keng Yap, et al. · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS