Is reproductive agency associated with subjective well-being? A population-based cross-sectional study among men and women in four sub-Saharan African countries using the World Values Survey

We investigated the association between reproductive agency (RA) and subjective well-being (SWB) in Ethiopia, Kenya, Nigeria, and Zimbabwe using cross-sectional research design. We used nationally representative data from the World Values Survey from 2017 to 2021 (N = 4948). SWB used four items on perceived: (i) life satisfaction (range 1-10), overall life agency (range 1-10), health status (range 1-5), and happiness (range 1-4). RA used one item on perceived freedom of choice and control over whether, when, and how many children to have (range 1-10). We compared SWB between 4302 respondents of high vs. low RA (cutoff based on the median) using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression, stratified by country and sex. 55% rated their RA as high (median, 8; interquartile range (IQR, 5-10). 66% rated their life satisfaction as high (median, 5; IQR, 4-8), and 51% rated their overall life agency as high (median, 8; IQR, 5-10). 75% reported themselves as healthy and happy. High RA was associated with higher life satisfaction (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.46) and overall life agency (aOR 3.70, 95% CI 3.24-4.24), particularly for women and respondents in Nigeria and Zimbabwe. Women's RA and wellbeing are linked, relevant when fertility becomes politicized globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2604450
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is reproductive agency associated with subjective well-being? A population-based cross-sectional study among men and women in four sub-Saharan African countries using the World Values Survey

Helena Litorp, Malachi Ochieng Arunda, Mariam Fagbemi, Karin Båge et al.
Critical Public Health
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Is reproductive agency associated with subjective well-being? A population-based cross-sectional study among men and women in four sub-Saharan African countries using the World Values Survey

Helena Litorp, Malachi Ochieng Arunda, Mariam Fagbemi, Karin Båge, Bi Puranen, Anna Mia Ekström, Olalekan Uthman, Anna Kågesten
article en

Abstract

We investigated the association between reproductive agency (RA) and subjective well-being (SWB) in Ethiopia, Kenya, Nigeria, and Zimbabwe using cross-sectional research design. We used nationally representative data from the World Values Survey from 2017 to 2021 (N = 4948). SWB used four items on perceived: (i) life satisfaction (range 1-10), overall life agency (range 1-10), health status (range 1-5), and happiness (range 1-4). RA used one item on perceived freedom of choice and control over whether, when, and how many children to have (range 1-10). We compared SWB between 4302 respondents of high vs. low RA (cutoff based on the median) using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression, stratified by country and sex. 55% rated their RA as high (median, 8; interquartile range (IQR, 5-10). 66% rated their life satisfaction as high (median, 5; IQR, 4-8), and 51% rated their overall life agency as high (median, 8; IQR, 5-10). 75% reported themselves as healthy and happy. High RA was associated with higher life satisfaction (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.46) and overall life agency (aOR 3.70, 95% CI 3.24-4.24), particularly for women and respondents in Nigeria and Zimbabwe. Women's RA and wellbeing are linked, relevant when fertility becomes politicized globally.

Critical Public HealthVol. 36(1)
Uppsala University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), University of Warwick (GB), Stockholm South General Hospital (SE), Institute for the Future (US), Kantar Health (United States) (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.