Effect of ozone therapy on post-operative pain following mandibular third molar surgical extraction: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of ozone therapy on pain reduction, trisma and number of analgesic tablets taken following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar.Methods A split-mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted in 54 patients in need of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars (Pell-Gregory class II-B) extraction. Test sites were treated with adjunctive ozone therapy to the surgical extraction, while controls underwent surgical intervention only (time between surgeries: 3 weeks). Study primary outcome measure was the difference in perceived pain recorded using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 7 days after surgery. In addition, functional limitation in mouth opening (mm), number of analgesic tablets taken within one week after surgery as well as the patient's perceived quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) were evaluated.Results Fifty patients (20 males and 30 females; median age: 21 years; all non-smokers) completed the study. Mean reported perceived pain decrease from 5.06 to 0.58 (test group) and from 5.62 to 1.08 (control group) between day 1 and 7. No statistically significant differences were detected between the two groups at any time points (p > 0.05). At day 7, mean mouth opening value was 40.8 vs. 36.6 mm in test and control group respectively (mean difference: 4.24 mm; p < 0.001; 95% CI: 6.55-1.93). The same trend was detected for the of number of analgesic tablets taken (median: 4 vs. 7; p = 0.01). Finally, OHIP-14 values did not differ between groups (p > 0.05).Conclusion Ozone therapy had a beneficial clinical effect in terms of mouth opening and in the number of analgesic tablets intake at 7 days after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar, despite the lack of adjunctive benefit on patients perceived pain reduction.Clinical Relevance The clinical use of ozone therapy as adjunct to surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar might be considered in light of the promising positive reported results in terms of mouth opening reduction and analgesic intake.Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT05949476.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/93455
Primary Topic
Medical and Biological Ozone Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of ozone therapy on post-operative pain following mandibular third molar surgical extraction: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Andrea Roccuzzo, Piermarco Babando, Guglielmo Amedeo Ramieri, Luca Guaschino et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Medical and Biological Ozone Research
article

Effect of ozone therapy on post-operative pain following mandibular third molar surgical extraction: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Andrea Roccuzzo, Piermarco Babando, Guglielmo Amedeo Ramieri, Luca Guaschino, Andrea Ricotti, Paolo Appendino, Alessandro Vanzanelli
article en

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of ozone therapy on pain reduction, trisma and number of analgesic tablets taken following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar.Methods A split-mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted in 54 patients in need of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars (Pell-Gregory class II-B) extraction. Test sites were treated with adjunctive ozone therapy to the surgical extraction, while controls underwent surgical intervention only (time between surgeries: 3 weeks). Study primary outcome measure was the difference in perceived pain recorded using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 7 days after surgery. In addition, functional limitation in mouth opening (mm), number of analgesic tablets taken within one week after surgery as well as the patient's perceived quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) were evaluated.Results Fifty patients (20 males and 30 females; median age: 21 years; all non-smokers) completed the study. Mean reported perceived pain decrease from 5.06 to 0.58 (test group) and from 5.62 to 1.08 (control group) between day 1 and 7. No statistically significant differences were detected between the two groups at any time points (p > 0.05). At day 7, mean mouth opening value was 40.8 vs. 36.6 mm in test and control group respectively (mean difference: 4.24 mm; p < 0.001; 95% CI: 6.55-1.93). The same trend was detected for the of number of analgesic tablets taken (median: 4 vs. 7; p = 0.01). Finally, OHIP-14 values did not differ between groups (p > 0.05).Conclusion Ozone therapy had a beneficial clinical effect in terms of mouth opening and in the number of analgesic tablets intake at 7 days after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar, despite the lack of adjunctive benefit on patients perceived pain reduction.Clinical Relevance The clinical use of ozone therapy as adjunct to surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar might be considered in light of the promising positive reported results in terms of mouth opening reduction and analgesic intake.Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT05949476.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
University of Dental Medicine (MM)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Medical and Biological Ozone Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.