Pricing mortgage insurance: Integrating target prescribed capital requirement for systematic risk

This study derives a closed-form formula for mortgage insurance (MI) premiums that accounts for systematic and idiosyncratic risks using option-pricing theory. This formula can be used to calculate the MI premium that incorporates the target prescribed capital requirement (PCR), which aims to manage systematic risk at a given confidence level. We illustrate the application of the model using U.S. state-level housing market data from 1991Q1 to 2017Q2, with 105 observations per state. Our results show that idiosyncratic risk exceeds systematic risk in the housing market. MI premiums, considering the target PCR, are larger than those without considering it. Sensitivity analyses further indicate that the MI premium increases with the parameters of both systematic and idiosyncratic risks. Our model and results should provide MI insurers with a practical tool for determining a fair MI premium under changing economic conditions and for strengthening risk management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Economics & Finance
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104882
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pricing mortgage insurance: Integrating target prescribed capital requirement for systematic risk

Shu Ling Chiang, Ming Shann Tsai
International Review of Economics & Finance
Housing Market and Economics
article

Pricing mortgage insurance: Integrating target prescribed capital requirement for systematic risk

Shu Ling Chiang, Ming Shann Tsai
article en

Abstract

This study derives a closed-form formula for mortgage insurance (MI) premiums that accounts for systematic and idiosyncratic risks using option-pricing theory. This formula can be used to calculate the MI premium that incorporates the target prescribed capital requirement (PCR), which aims to manage systematic risk at a given confidence level. We illustrate the application of the model using U.S. state-level housing market data from 1991Q1 to 2017Q2, with 105 observations per state. Our results show that idiosyncratic risk exceeds systematic risk in the housing market. MI premiums, considering the target PCR, are larger than those without considering it. Sensitivity analyses further indicate that the MI premium increases with the parameters of both systematic and idiosyncratic risks. Our model and results should provide MI insurers with a practical tool for determining a fair MI premium under changing economic conditions and for strengthening risk management.

International Review of Economics & FinanceVol. 105
National Kaohsiung Normal University (TW), National University of Kaohsiung (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Housing Market and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pricing mortgage insurance: Integrating target prescribed capital requirement for systematic risk — Shu Ling Chiang, Ming Shann Tsai · International Review of Economics & Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS