Design and Evaluation of Stand-to-Sit and Sit-to-Stand Control Protocols for a HIP–Knee–Ankle–Foot Prosthesis with a Motorized Hip Joint

<b>Background:</b> Sitting and standing with conventional hip-knee-ankle-foot (HKAF) prostheses are demanding tasks for hip disarticulation (HD) amputees due to the passive nature of current prosthetic hip joints that cannot assist with moment generation. This study developed a sitting and standing control strategy for a motorized hip joint and evaluated whether providing active assistance reduces the intact side demand of these activities. <b>Methods:</b> A dedicated control strategy was developed and implemented for a motorized hip prosthesis (Power Hip) compatible with existing prosthetic knees, feet, and sockets. One HD participant was trained to perform sitting and standing tasks using the Power Hip. Its performance was compared with the participant's prescribed passive HKAF prosthesis through measurements of ground reaction forces (GRFs), joint moments, and activity durations. GRFs were collected using force plates, kinematics were captured via Theia3D markerless motion capture, and joint moments were computed in Visual3D. <b>Results:</b> The Power Hip enabled more symmetric limb loading and faster stand-to-sit transitions (1.22 ± 0.08 s vs. 2.62 ± 0.41 s), while slightly prolonging sit-to-stand (1.69 ± 0.49 s vs. 1.22 ± 0.40 s) compared to the passive HKAF. The participant exhibited reduced intact-side loading impulses during stand-to-sit (4.97 ± 0.78 N∙s/kg vs. 15.06 ± 2.90 N∙s/kg) and decreased reliance on upper-limb support. Hip moment asymmetries between the intact and prosthetic sides were also reduced during both sit-to-stand (-0.18 ± 0.09 N/kg vs. -0.69 ± 0.67 N/kg) and stand-to-sit transitions (0.77 ± 0.20 N/kg vs. 2.03 ± 0.58 N/kg). <b>Conclusions:</b> The prototype and control strategy demonstrated promising improvements in sitting and standing performance compared to conventional passive prostheses, reducing the physical demand on the intact limb and upper body.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13010048
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design and Evaluation of Stand-to-Sit and Sit-to-Stand Control Protocols for a HIP–Knee–Ankle–Foot Prosthesis with a Motorized Hip Joint

David Nielen, Edward D. Lemaire, Natalie Baddour, Hossein Gholizadeh et al.
Bioengineering
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Design and Evaluation of Stand-to-Sit and Sit-to-Stand Control Protocols for a HIP–Knee–Ankle–Foot Prosthesis with a Motorized Hip Joint

David Nielen, Edward D. Lemaire, Natalie Baddour, Hossein Gholizadeh, Farshad Golshan
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Sitting and standing with conventional hip-knee-ankle-foot (HKAF) prostheses are demanding tasks for hip disarticulation (HD) amputees due to the passive nature of current prosthetic hip joints that cannot assist with moment generation. This study developed a sitting and standing control strategy for a motorized hip joint and evaluated whether providing active assistance reduces the intact side demand of these activities. <b>Methods:</b> A dedicated control strategy was developed and implemented for a motorized hip prosthesis (Power Hip) compatible with existing prosthetic knees, feet, and sockets. One HD participant was trained to perform sitting and standing tasks using the Power Hip. Its performance was compared with the participant's prescribed passive HKAF prosthesis through measurements of ground reaction forces (GRFs), joint moments, and activity durations. GRFs were collected using force plates, kinematics were captured via Theia3D markerless motion capture, and joint moments were computed in Visual3D. <b>Results:</b> The Power Hip enabled more symmetric limb loading and faster stand-to-sit transitions (1.22 ± 0.08 s vs. 2.62 ± 0.41 s), while slightly prolonging sit-to-stand (1.69 ± 0.49 s vs. 1.22 ± 0.40 s) compared to the passive HKAF. The participant exhibited reduced intact-side loading impulses during stand-to-sit (4.97 ± 0.78 N∙s/kg vs. 15.06 ± 2.90 N∙s/kg) and decreased reliance on upper-limb support. Hip moment asymmetries between the intact and prosthetic sides were also reduced during both sit-to-stand (-0.18 ± 0.09 N/kg vs. -0.69 ± 0.67 N/kg) and stand-to-sit transitions (0.77 ± 0.20 N/kg vs. 2.03 ± 0.58 N/kg). <b>Conclusions:</b> The prototype and control strategy demonstrated promising improvements in sitting and standing performance compared to conventional passive prostheses, reducing the physical demand on the intact limb and upper body.

BioengineeringVol. 13(1)
Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
University of Ottawa, Mitacs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.