Association between digit ratio (2D:4D) and right–left difference in 2D:4D ratio with breast cancer risk: multicentre case–control study from India

Recently, the second to fourth fingers/digits ratio (2D:4D) has been reported to be associated with breast cancer (BC). We aimed to assess whether this association exists in Indian population. We derived the 2D:4D of right and left-hand from length of the index and ring finger, measured using Vernier callipers. We also calculated the right minus left 2D:4D (DR−L). For 1638 BC cases and 1723 controls, univariate unconditional logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) with its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We observed reduced risk of BC with increase in right 2D:4D in pre- menopausal women (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52–0.96), while for post-menopausal women there was non-significant positive association. For left 2D:4D, non-significant slight increased risk of BC was observed in the highest category amongst the premenopausal women (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.82–1.52). For DR−L we observed inverse association in pre-menopausal women only (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58–0.92). The association between the 2D:4D ratio and BC risk was weak and inconsistent across pre-/post-menopausal groups. Larger and more precise studies with longitudinal follow-up, and reduced random measurement error are needed to clarify whether a clinically meaningful 2D:4D ratio threshold can reliably predict BC risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33919-2
Primary Topic
Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between digit ratio (2D:4D) and right–left difference in 2D:4D ratio with breast cancer risk: multicentre case–control study from India

Sharayu Mhatre, Garvit Chitkara, Aniket Patil, Romi Moirangthem et al.
Scientific Reports
Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
article

Association between digit ratio (2D:4D) and right–left difference in 2D:4D ratio with breast cancer risk: multicentre case–control study from India

Sharayu Mhatre, Garvit Chitkara, Aniket Patil, Romi Moirangthem, Siddhartha Kar, George Davey Smith, Rajesh Dikshit
article en

Abstract

Recently, the second to fourth fingers/digits ratio (2D:4D) has been reported to be associated with breast cancer (BC). We aimed to assess whether this association exists in Indian population. We derived the 2D:4D of right and left-hand from length of the index and ring finger, measured using Vernier callipers. We also calculated the right minus left 2D:4D (DR−L). For 1638 BC cases and 1723 controls, univariate unconditional logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) with its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We observed reduced risk of BC with increase in right 2D:4D in pre- menopausal women (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52–0.96), while for post-menopausal women there was non-significant positive association. For left 2D:4D, non-significant slight increased risk of BC was observed in the highest category amongst the premenopausal women (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.82–1.52). For DR−L we observed inverse association in pre-menopausal women only (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58–0.92). The association between the 2D:4D ratio and BC risk was weak and inconsistent across pre-/post-menopausal groups. Larger and more precise studies with longitudinal follow-up, and reduced random measurement error are needed to clarify whether a clinically meaningful 2D:4D ratio threshold can reliably predict BC risk.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN), University of Cambridge (GB), Max Super Speciality Hospital (IN), University of Bristol (GB), Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (IN), Medical Research Council (GB)
Tata Memorial Centre
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.