Disputing voices in the regulation of work on digital platforms in Brazil: A decolonial perspective

Although labor law should represent the voices of all working classes, its epistemology has never reflected labor relations from the ‘Global South’. The lack of legal protection for collective organization and actions exercised by ‘non-white’ people from the ‘Global South’ can be seen as a result of coloniality in labor law. Considering this epistemic coloniality, we will address the voice disputes in the regulation of work on digital platforms in Brazil in four sections: (1) the social scenario of platform work; (2) the main controversies of legal regulation involving courts; (3) the national negotiating roundtable, with the resulting Bill 12/2024; and (4) a decolonial analysis of the regulation of platform work. The qualitative legal–sociological and the observation–participatory method were applied. We conclude that with a legal epistemology intertwined in coloniality, Brazilian labor law performs a regulation of work on digital platforms that maintains racial and social structures of the power of colonization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Social Policy
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181251393072
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disputing voices in the regulation of work on digital platforms in Brazil: A decolonial perspective

Renata Queiroz Dutra, Flávia Máximo
Global Social Policy
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Disputing voices in the regulation of work on digital platforms in Brazil: A decolonial perspective

Renata Queiroz Dutra, Flávia Máximo
article en

Abstract

Although labor law should represent the voices of all working classes, its epistemology has never reflected labor relations from the ‘Global South’. The lack of legal protection for collective organization and actions exercised by ‘non-white’ people from the ‘Global South’ can be seen as a result of coloniality in labor law. Considering this epistemic coloniality, we will address the voice disputes in the regulation of work on digital platforms in Brazil in four sections: (1) the social scenario of platform work; (2) the main controversies of legal regulation involving courts; (3) the national negotiating roundtable, with the resulting Bill 12/2024; and (4) a decolonial analysis of the regulation of platform work. The qualitative legal–sociological and the observation–participatory method were applied. We conclude that with a legal epistemology intertwined in coloniality, Brazilian labor law performs a regulation of work on digital platforms that maintains racial and social structures of the power of colonization.

Global Social Policy
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (BR), Universidade de Brasília (BR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.