Coupled SWAT–MODFLOW Model for the Interaction Between Groundwater and Surface Water in an Alpine Inland River Basin

For an alpine inland river basin affected by climate change, the interaction between groundwater (GW) and surface water (SW) within the watershed plays a crucial role in water resource management. To explore the bidirectional dynamic coupling of surface water and groundwater, this work adopted the extensively employed SWAT–MODFLOW model. Results indicate that statistical parameters including R2 (0.81 for calibration periods and 0.79 for validation), NSE (0.79 for calibration periods and 0.75 for validation), RMSE (0.59~1.25 m), and PBIAS (15.21%) demonstrate the dependability of the SWAT–MODFLOW model in evaluating groundwater–surface water exchange processes within alpine inland river basins. Long-term monitoring data show that groundwater levels exhibited an upward trend, rising from 2895.35 m in 2005 to 2906.75 m in 2022. Notably, since 2018, groundwater levels have entered a period of being consistently above the long-term average. In terms of spatial distribution, the groundwater level patterns in 2005, 2010, and 2015 remained relatively consistent, marked by a west-to-east decreasing gradient. However, by 2020, this spatial distribution pattern shifted, marked by an east-to-west decreasing gradient. Meanwhile, our results reveal a pattern of upstream surface water recharge, bidirectional fluctuation in the middle reaches, and downstream groundwater-dominated recharge during the period of 2000~2023. During the 2000–2009 period, groundwater in sub5 received recharge from surface water, with the exchange rate ranging from −4987.75 to −374.82 m3/d. Conversely, during 2010–2023, groundwater in sub5 discharged into surface water, with the exchange rate ranging from 1136.75 to 56,646.56 m3/d. Moreover, there is seasonal variability in the SW–GW interchange relationship. In spring and summer, surface water primarily replenishes groundwater, whereas in autumn and winter, groundwater primarily replenishes surface water. This study provides a foundational method for assessing groundwater–surface water interactions in alpine inland river basins, which will contribute to the evaluation and management of local water resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18010085
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coupled SWAT–MODFLOW Model for the Interaction Between Groundwater and Surface Water in an Alpine Inland River Basin

WenPeng Li, Guangxiong Qin, Yuejun Zheng, Zhen Zhao et al.
1 citations
Water
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
article

Coupled SWAT–MODFLOW Model for the Interaction Between Groundwater and Surface Water in an Alpine Inland River Basin

WenPeng Li, Guangxiong Qin, Yuejun Zheng, Zhen Zhao, Shuai Song, Xianghui Cao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For an alpine inland river basin affected by climate change, the interaction between groundwater (GW) and surface water (SW) within the watershed plays a crucial role in water resource management. To explore the bidirectional dynamic coupling of surface water and groundwater, this work adopted the extensively employed SWAT–MODFLOW model. Results indicate that statistical parameters including R2 (0.81 for calibration periods and 0.79 for validation), NSE (0.79 for calibration periods and 0.75 for validation), RMSE (0.59~1.25 m), and PBIAS (15.21%) demonstrate the dependability of the SWAT–MODFLOW model in evaluating groundwater–surface water exchange processes within alpine inland river basins. Long-term monitoring data show that groundwater levels exhibited an upward trend, rising from 2895.35 m in 2005 to 2906.75 m in 2022. Notably, since 2018, groundwater levels have entered a period of being consistently above the long-term average. In terms of spatial distribution, the groundwater level patterns in 2005, 2010, and 2015 remained relatively consistent, marked by a west-to-east decreasing gradient. However, by 2020, this spatial distribution pattern shifted, marked by an east-to-west decreasing gradient. Meanwhile, our results reveal a pattern of upstream surface water recharge, bidirectional fluctuation in the middle reaches, and downstream groundwater-dominated recharge during the period of 2000~2023. During the 2000–2009 period, groundwater in sub5 received recharge from surface water, with the exchange rate ranging from −4987.75 to −374.82 m3/d. Conversely, during 2010–2023, groundwater in sub5 discharged into surface water, with the exchange rate ranging from 1136.75 to 56,646.56 m3/d. Moreover, there is seasonal variability in the SW–GW interchange relationship. In spring and summer, surface water primarily replenishes groundwater, whereas in autumn and winter, groundwater primarily replenishes surface water. This study provides a foundational method for assessing groundwater–surface water interactions in alpine inland river basins, which will contribute to the evaluation and management of local water resources.

WaterVol. 18(1)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences (CN), Qinghai Meteorological Bureau (CN), China Institute of Geological Environmental Monitoring (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.