Elevating Engaged Scholarship in Landscape Architecture: Strategies for Recognition in the Merit and Promotion Process

Participatory Action Research (PAR) supports community-engaged scholarship (CES) by fostering deep collaboration, mutual learning, and actionable outcomes through the active involvement of stakeholders as co-researchers in addressing real-world challenges. In landscape architecture education and practice, engaged scholarship connects university-based research, teaching, and service to broader community needs, advancing institutional missions. Despite its value, this work remains time-intensive and is often undervalued in merit and promotion processes that privilege traditional academic metrics like publication and citation counts. To better support CES, some universities have begun expanding definitions of scholarship and evaluative criteria, though challenges remain in validating and recognizing their broader impacts. This paper unpacks multi-level strategies for supporting CES across institutions of higher education. At the campus level, we examine initiatives such as institution-wide dossier statement guidelines on public impact and participation in the Carnegie Community Engagement Classification as signals of formal commitments to engagement. At the college, departmental, and unit levels, we highlight reforms including revised authorship conventions to recognize collaborative and participatory research, expanded definitions of scholarly output, and the integration of CES into promotion guidelines and mentorship structures. At the individual level, we share techniques for framing alternative project metrics within review narratives and documenting public and scholarly impact in ways that align with both disciplinary norms and institutional expectations. Through these strategies, the paper offers practical insights into the challenges engaged scholars face and provides recommendations for how units and institutions can pursue opportunities for developing more inclusive and supportive evaluation frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Participatory Research Methods
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.154099
Primary Topic
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elevating Engaged Scholarship in Landscape Architecture: Strategies for Recognition in the Merit and Promotion Process

Catherine De Almeida* (These authors contributed equally to this work), Emily Schlickman* (These authors contributed equally to this work), Phoebe White* (These authors contributed equally to this work), Patsy Owens* (These authors contributed equally to this work)
Journal of Participatory Research Methods
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
article

Elevating Engaged Scholarship in Landscape Architecture: Strategies for Recognition in the Merit and Promotion Process

Catherine De Almeida* (These authors contributed equally to this work), Emily Schlickman* (These authors contributed equally to this work), Phoebe White* (These authors contributed equally to this work), Patsy Owens* (These authors contributed equally to this work)
article en

Abstract

Participatory Action Research (PAR) supports community-engaged scholarship (CES) by fostering deep collaboration, mutual learning, and actionable outcomes through the active involvement of stakeholders as co-researchers in addressing real-world challenges. In landscape architecture education and practice, engaged scholarship connects university-based research, teaching, and service to broader community needs, advancing institutional missions. Despite its value, this work remains time-intensive and is often undervalued in merit and promotion processes that privilege traditional academic metrics like publication and citation counts. To better support CES, some universities have begun expanding definitions of scholarship and evaluative criteria, though challenges remain in validating and recognizing their broader impacts. This paper unpacks multi-level strategies for supporting CES across institutions of higher education. At the campus level, we examine initiatives such as institution-wide dossier statement guidelines on public impact and participation in the Carnegie Community Engagement Classification as signals of formal commitments to engagement. At the college, departmental, and unit levels, we highlight reforms including revised authorship conventions to recognize collaborative and participatory research, expanded definitions of scholarly output, and the integration of CES into promotion guidelines and mentorship structures. At the individual level, we share techniques for framing alternative project metrics within review narratives and documenting public and scholarly impact in ways that align with both disciplinary norms and institutional expectations. Through these strategies, the paper offers practical insights into the challenges engaged scholars face and provides recommendations for how units and institutions can pursue opportunities for developing more inclusive and supportive evaluation frameworks.

Journal of Participatory Research MethodsVol. 6(5)
University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.