Laparoscopic management of incisional hernia: Emphasis on intraperitoneal mesh-related complications and comparative advantages over the open technique

Background: Incisional hernia is a common surgical complication with significant morbidity, traditionally managed by open mesh repair. Laparoscopic techniques have gained popularity due to potential advantages in recovery and complication profile, particularly concerning mesh-related outcomes. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes, safety profile, and recovery patterns of laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair, with special emphasis on mesh-related complications. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Datia, from October 2024 to September 2025. A total of 90 patients diagnosed with incisional hernia were equally divided into two groups: Laparoscopic repair (n=45) and open repair (n=45). Intraoperative parameters (operative time, blood loss), post-operative outcomes (pain scores, complications, hospital stay, return to activity, recurrence), and patient satisfaction were recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: Laparoscopic repair required longer operative time (72.5±5.3 vs. 61.4±4.8 min, P=0.001) but resulted in significantly less blood loss (27.2±4.5 vs. 49.8±9.2 mL, P=0.001). Post-operative pain scores were consistently lower in the laparoscopic group at all-time points (P=0.001). Overall complication rates were markedly reduced in the laparoscopic cohort (15.6% vs. 37.8%, P=0.01). Hospital stay (2.6±0.7 vs. 6.4±0.9 days, P=0.001) and time to return to normal activity (12.1±1.8 vs. 19.8±1.5 days, P=0.001) were also significantly shorter. Recurrence was observed only in the open group (4.4%). Patient satisfaction scores were higher with laparoscopy (8.6±1.2 vs. 6.9±1.4, P=0.001). Conclusion: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is a safe, effective, and patient-friendly alternative to open repair, offering superior short-term outcomes and fewer complications despite a slightly longer operative duration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v17i1.4946
Primary Topic
Hernia repair and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laparoscopic management of incisional hernia: Emphasis on intraperitoneal mesh-related complications and comparative advantages over the open technique

Kedarnath Arya, Diwakar Sharma, Chandraverman Singh, Rajesh Kumar Badal
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Hernia repair and management
article

Laparoscopic management of incisional hernia: Emphasis on intraperitoneal mesh-related complications and comparative advantages over the open technique

Kedarnath Arya, Diwakar Sharma, Chandraverman Singh, Rajesh Kumar Badal
article en

Abstract

Background: Incisional hernia is a common surgical complication with significant morbidity, traditionally managed by open mesh repair. Laparoscopic techniques have gained popularity due to potential advantages in recovery and complication profile, particularly concerning mesh-related outcomes. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes, safety profile, and recovery patterns of laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair, with special emphasis on mesh-related complications. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Datia, from October 2024 to September 2025. A total of 90 patients diagnosed with incisional hernia were equally divided into two groups: Laparoscopic repair (n=45) and open repair (n=45). Intraoperative parameters (operative time, blood loss), post-operative outcomes (pain scores, complications, hospital stay, return to activity, recurrence), and patient satisfaction were recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: Laparoscopic repair required longer operative time (72.5±5.3 vs. 61.4±4.8 min, P=0.001) but resulted in significantly less blood loss (27.2±4.5 vs. 49.8±9.2 mL, P=0.001). Post-operative pain scores were consistently lower in the laparoscopic group at all-time points (P=0.001). Overall complication rates were markedly reduced in the laparoscopic cohort (15.6% vs. 37.8%, P=0.01). Hospital stay (2.6±0.7 vs. 6.4±0.9 days, P=0.001) and time to return to normal activity (12.1±1.8 vs. 19.8±1.5 days, P=0.001) were also significantly shorter. Recurrence was observed only in the open group (4.4%). Patient satisfaction scores were higher with laparoscopy (8.6±1.2 vs. 6.9±1.4, P=0.001). Conclusion: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is a safe, effective, and patient-friendly alternative to open repair, offering superior short-term outcomes and fewer complications despite a slightly longer operative duration.

Asian Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 17(1)
Government General Hospital (IN), Government Medical College (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Hernia repair and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.