The Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Sodium Channel Blocker Therapy for Rhythm Control in Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from the REGUEIFA Registry

<b>Background:</b> The aim of this study is to assess the safety of sodium channel blocker (SCB) therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). <b>Methods:</b> The REGUEIFA registry is a prospective, observational, multicenter registry from a Community Health Area in Spain that recruited patients with AF, whom it followed for 2 years. <b>Results:</b> From the 997 patients, 632 were assigned to a rhythm control strategy and analyzed. Patients exposed to SCBs demonstrated a risk ratio (RR) of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.18-0.79; <i>p</i> = 0.007) for worsening heart failure (HF), and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.21-0.78; <i>p</i> = 0.005) for the composite endpoint (death, ischemic stroke, or worsening HF), with no significant differences in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, ischemic stroke, or bleeding compared with patients not exposed to SCBs. In the subgroup of patients with structural heart disease, no differences were observed between those exposed and those not exposed to SCBs across all the clinical outcomes analyzed (all-cause mortality, CV mortality, ischemic stroke, bleeding and composite event). However, a lower event trend was observed across all these variables. The rate of sinus rhythm at 2 years follow-up was significantly higher in the SCB group (81.8% vs. 63.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). During Cox regression analysis for all-cause mortality, SCB exposure was not identified as an independent factor (HR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.17-3.87; <i>p</i> = 0.802). Age (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.04-1.17; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and HF (HR: 4.23; 95% CI: 1.63-11.00; <i>p</i> = 0.003) were the only predictors of mortality. <b>Conclusions:</b> SCB therapy appears to be safe and effective, both in the overall cohort and in the patient subgroup with AF and structural heart disease. These agents may play a role in AF management in patients with revascularized coronary heart disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, and HF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Sciences
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14010016
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Sodium Channel Blocker Therapy for Rhythm Control in Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from the REGUEIFA Registry

Óscar Prada Delgado, Miriam Piñeiro Portela, Juliana Elices Teja, Raquel Marzoa et al.
Medical Sciences
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

The Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Sodium Channel Blocker Therapy for Rhythm Control in Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from the REGUEIFA Registry

Óscar Prada Delgado, Miriam Piñeiro Portela, Juliana Elices Teja, Raquel Marzoa, Evaristo Freire, Pilar Cabanas Grandío, María Vázquez Caamaño, Francisco Gude, C Minguito Carazo, Emilio Fernández-Obanza Windcheid, Javier Muñiz, Mario Gutiérrez Feijoo, Eva González Babarro, Eduardo Barge-Caballero, Carlos González-Juanatey, Olga Durán Bobín, Laila González Melchor, Javier García-Seara
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The aim of this study is to assess the safety of sodium channel blocker (SCB) therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). <b>Methods:</b> The REGUEIFA registry is a prospective, observational, multicenter registry from a Community Health Area in Spain that recruited patients with AF, whom it followed for 2 years. <b>Results:</b> From the 997 patients, 632 were assigned to a rhythm control strategy and analyzed. Patients exposed to SCBs demonstrated a risk ratio (RR) of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.18-0.79; <i>p</i> = 0.007) for worsening heart failure (HF), and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.21-0.78; <i>p</i> = 0.005) for the composite endpoint (death, ischemic stroke, or worsening HF), with no significant differences in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, ischemic stroke, or bleeding compared with patients not exposed to SCBs. In the subgroup of patients with structural heart disease, no differences were observed between those exposed and those not exposed to SCBs across all the clinical outcomes analyzed (all-cause mortality, CV mortality, ischemic stroke, bleeding and composite event). However, a lower event trend was observed across all these variables. The rate of sinus rhythm at 2 years follow-up was significantly higher in the SCB group (81.8% vs. 63.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). During Cox regression analysis for all-cause mortality, SCB exposure was not identified as an independent factor (HR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.17-3.87; <i>p</i> = 0.802). Age (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.04-1.17; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and HF (HR: 4.23; 95% CI: 1.63-11.00; <i>p</i> = 0.003) were the only predictors of mortality. <b>Conclusions:</b> SCB therapy appears to be safe and effective, both in the overall cohort and in the patient subgroup with AF and structural heart disease. These agents may play a role in AF management in patients with revascularized coronary heart disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, and HF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Medical SciencesVol. 14(1)
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), University Hospital Complex Of Vigo (ES), Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (ES), Servicio Gallego de Salud (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (ES), Hospital Montecelo (ES), Complejo Hospitalario de Ourense (ES), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.